Труды сотрудников ИЛ им. В.Н. Сукачева СО РАН

[Text] / D. . Sulla-Menashe [et al.] // Remote Sens. Environ. - 2011. - Vol. 115, Is. 2. - P392-403, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.09.010. - Cited References: 71. - The research was supported by NASA grant numbers NNG06GF54G and NNX08AE61A. An additional thanks goes to Dr. Bin Tan who was instrumental in implementing the MODIS classification algorithms, and to the rest of the NELDA team for helpful input and discussions. . - 12. - ISSN 0034-4257РУБ Environmental Sciences + Remote Sensing + Imaging Science & Photographic Technology

Аннотация: The Northern Eurasian land mass encompasses a diverse array of land cover types including tundra, boreal forest, wetlands, semi-arid steppe, and agricultural land use. Despite the well-established importance of Northern Eurasia in the global carbon and climate system, the distribution and properties of land cover in this region are not well characterized. To address this knowledge and data gap, a hierarchical mapping approach was developed that encompasses the study area for the Northern Eurasia Earth System Partnership Initiative (NEESPI). The Northern Eurasia Land Cover (NELC) database developed in this study follows the FAO-land Cover Classification System and provides nested groupings of land cover characteristics, with separate layers for land use, wetlands, and tundra. The database implementation is substantially different from other large-scale land cover datasets that provide maps based on a single set of discrete classes. By providing a database consisting of nested maps and complementary layers, the NELC database provides a flexible framework that allows users to tailor maps to suit their needs. The methods used to create the database combine empirically derived climate-vegetation relationships with results from supervised classifications based on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. The hierarchical approach provides an effective framework for integrating climate-vegetation relationships with remote sensing-based classifications, and also allows sources of error to be characterized and attributed to specific levels in the hierarchy. The cross-validated accuracy was 73% for the land cover map and 73% and 91% for the agriculture and wetland classifications, respectively. These results support the use of hierarchical classification and climate-vegetation relationships for mapping land cover at continental scales. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

WOS,
Полный текст,
Scopus

Держатели документа:
[Sulla-Menashe, Damien
Friedl, Mark A.
Woodcock, Curtis E.
Sibley, Adam] Boston Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[Krankina, Olga N.] Oregon State Univ, Coll Forestry, Dept Forest Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[Baccini, Alessandro] Woods Hole Res Ctr, Falmouth, MA 02540 USA
[Sun, Guoqing] NASA, GSFC, Biospher Sci Branch, Greenbelt, MD 20770 USA
[Kharuk, Viacheslav] Acad Gorodok Krasnoyarsk, Sukachev Forest Inst, Forest Ecol & Monitoring Branch, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia
[Elsakov, Vladimir] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Komi Sci Ctr, Syktyvkar 167610, Russia

Доп.точки доступа:
Sulla-Menashe, D...; Friedl, M.A.; Krankina, O.N.; Baccini, A...; Woodcock, C.E.; Sibley, A...; Sun, G.Q.; Kharuk, V...; Elsakov, V...

[Text] / V. I. Kharuk [et al.] // Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. - 2010. - Vol. 19, Is. 6. - P822-830, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00555.x. - Cited References: 33. - This research was supported by the NASA Science Mission Directorate, Terrestrial Ecology Program, the Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Science Program no. 23.3.33, and grant no. MK-2497.2009.5. Thanks to Joanne Howl for edits of the manuscript. . - 9. - ISSN 1466-822XРУБ Ecology + Geography, Physical

Аннотация: Aim To evaluate the hypothesis that topographic features of high-elevation mountain environments govern spatial distribution and climate-driven dynamics of the forest. Location Upper mountain forest stands (elevation range 1800-2600 m) in the mountains of southern Siberia. Methods Archive maps, satellite and on-ground data from1960 to 2002 were used. Data were normalized to avoid bias caused by uneven distribution of topographic features (elevation, azimuth and slope steepness) within the analysed area. Spatial distribution of forest stands was analysed with respect to topography based on a digital elevation model (DEM). Results Spatial patterns in mountain forests are anisotropic with respect to azimuth, slope steepness and elevation. At a given elevation, the majority of forests occupied slopes with greater than mean slope values. As the elevation increased, forests shifted to steeper slopes. The orientation of forest azimuth distribution changed clockwise with increase in elevation (the total shift was 120 degrees), indicating a combined effect of wind and water stress on the observed forest patterns. Warming caused changes in the forest distribution patterns during the last four decades. The area of closed forests increased 1.5 times, which was attributed to increased stand density and tree migration. The migration rate was 1.5 +/- 0.9 m year-1, causing a mean forest line shift of 63 +/- 37 m. Along with upward migration, downward tree migration onto hill slopes was observed. Changes in tree morphology were also noted as widespread transformation of the prostrate forms of Siberian pine and larch into erect forms. Main conclusions The spatial pattern of upper mountain forests as well as the response of forests to warming strongly depends on topographic relief features (elevation, azimuth and slope steepness). With elevation increase (and thus a harsher environment) forests shifted to steep wind-protected slopes. A considerable increase in the stand area and increased elevation of the upper forest line was observed coincident with the climate warming that was observed. Warming promotes migration of trees to areas that are less protected from winter desiccation and snow abrasion (i.e. areas with lower values of slope steepness). Climate-induced forest response has significantly modified the spatial patterns of high-elevation forests in southern Siberia during the last four decades, as well as tree morphology.

Полный текст,
WOS,
Scopus

Держатели документа:
[Kharuk, Vyacheslav I.
Im, Sergey T.] Sukachev Inst Forest SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia
[Ranson, Kenneth J.] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[Vdovin, Alexander S.] Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia

Доп.точки доступа:
Kharuk, V.I.; Ranson, K.J.; Im, S.T.; Vdovin, A.S.

[Text] / W. C. Shortle [et al.] // J. Biogeogr. - 1995. - Vol. 22: 1st Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems Science Conference (MAY 23-27, 1994, WOODS HOLE, MA), Is. 02.03.2013. - P467-473, DOI 10.2307/2845943. - Cited References: 11 . - 7. - ISSN 0305-0270РУБ Ecology + Geography, Physical

Аннотация: Changes in stemwood calcium concentration ([Ca]) for the last 120 years occurred in a common pattern for two sample collections of red spruce (n=33 and 20) from the northeastern United States and for one sample collection of Siberian fir (n=20) from southcentral Siberia, Russia. The [Ca] was measured for wood formed during the periods 1871-90, 1891-1910, 1911-30, 1931-50, 1951-70 and 1971-90. For each core, the relative increase or decrease in [Ca] for adjacent periods of wood formation was recorded. The relative frequency of positive change in [Ca] for each period of wood formation was calculated for the three sample collections. Previous research indicated that under equilibrium conditions, [Ca] in stemwood tended to decrease in more recently formed wood, due to declining numbers of Ca binding sites. Consequently, we expected a low frequency of positive changes in [Ca] in successively formed wood. Consistent with expectation, the relative frequency of positive change from the preceding period to the periods 1891-1910, 1911-30, 1931-50, and 1971-90 were low. Contrary to expectation, the frequency of positive increases in [Ca] more than doubled in 1951-70 compared to 1931-50. The frequency of positive increases in the 1951-70 period relative to the preceding period was 48%, significantly greater than all other periods (P less than or equal to 0.01). The frequencies of positive increases for all other periods were not significantly different from each other (overall mean = 21%, SD = 7). This anomaly in the frequency of positive change in [Ca] in wood formed in 1951-70 relative to wood formed in 1931-50 indicated a perturbation in the ion exchange chemistry of stemwood in two widely separated parts of the northern coniferous forest. This anomaly could be due to external or internal factors. Changes in sap chemistry that affected stemwood chemistry could have been due to changes in the rooting zone. Such changes in rooting zone chemistry could result from the atmospheric deposition of ionic pollutants. Other external factors that could cause the observed anomaly include unusual climatic periods or environmental disturbances such as logging or fire. Internal factors that might produce an anomalously high frequency of positive change of [Ca] include heartwood formation, stemwood infection and a hypersensitive response of the tree against infection.

WOS

Держатели документа:
US FOREST SERV,DURHAM,NH 03824
VV SUKACHEV FOREST INST,KRASNOYARSK 660036,RUSSIA

Доп.точки доступа:
Shortle, W.C.; Smith, K.T.; Minocha, R...; Alexeyev, V.A.

[Text] / P. E. Tarasov [et al.] // J. Biogeogr. - 1998. - Vol. 25, Is. 6. - P1029-1053, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.00236.x. - Cited References: 140 . - 25. - ISSN 0305-0270РУБ Ecology + Geography, Physical

Аннотация: Fossil pollen data supplemented by tree macrofossil records were used to reconstruct the vegetation of the Former Soviet Union and Mongolia at 6000 years. Pollen spectra were assigned to biomes using the plant-functional-type method developed by Prentice ct al. (1996). Surface pollen data and a modern vegetation map provided a test of the method. This is the first time such a broad-scale vegetation reconstruction for the greater part of northern Eurasia has been attempted with objective techniques. The new results confirm previous regional palaeoenvironmental studies of the mid-Holocene while providing a comprehensive synopsis and firmer conclusions. West of the Ural Mountains temperate deciduous forest extended both northward and southward from its modern range. The northern limits of cool mixed and cool conifer forests were also further north than present. Taiga was reduced in European Russia, but was extended into Yakutia where now there is cold deciduous forest. The northern limit of taiga was extended (as shown by increased Picea pollen percentages, and by tree macrofossil records north of the present-day forest limit) but tundra was still present in north-eastern Siberia. The boundary between forest and steppe in the continental interior did not shift substantially, and dry conditions similar to present existed in western Mongolia and north of the Aral Sea.

Полный текст,
WOS

Держатели документа:
Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Dept Geog, Moscow 119899, Russia
Univ Lund, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
Brown Univ, Dept Geol Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Geog, Moscow 109017, Russia
Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Dept Biol, Moscow 119899, Russia
Ukrainian Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Kiev, Ukraine
Tomsk State Univ, Inst Biol & Biophys, Tomsk 634050, Russia
Fac Sci & Tech St Jerome, CNRS, UA 1152, Lab Bot Hist & Palynol, F-13397 Marseille 20, France
St Petersburg State Univ, Dept Geog & Geoecol, St Petersburg 199178, Russia
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Evolut & Ecol, Moscow 109017, Russia
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Karelian Branch, Petrozavodsk 185610, Russia
Russian Acad Sci, Forest Inst, Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia
Univ Lund, Dept Plant Ecol, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Limnol, St Petersburg 196199, Russia
Georgian Acad Sci, Inst Palaeobiol, GE-380004 Tbilisi, Rep of Georgia
Cent Geol Lab, Moscow, Russia
Russian Acad Sci, Forest Inst, Ural Branch, Ekaterinburg 620134, Russia
Estonian Acad Sci, Inst Geol, EE-0105 Tallinn, Estonia
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Geol, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Inst Geol Sci, Minsk 220141, Byelarus

Доп.точки доступа:
Tarasov, P.E.; Webb, T...; Andreev, A.A.; Afanas'eva, N.B.; Berezina, N.A.; Bezusko, L.G.; Blyakharchuk, T.A.; Bolikhovskaya, N.S.; Cheddadi, R...; Chernavskaya, M.M.; Chernova, G.M.; Dorofeyuk, N.I.; Dirksen, V.G.; Elina, G.A.; Filimonova, L.V.; Glebov, F.Z.; Guiot, J...; Gunova, V.S.; Harrison, S.P.; Jolly, D...; Khomutova, V.I.; Kvavadze, E.V.; Osipova, I.M.; Panova, N.K.; Prentice, I.C.; Saarse, L...; Sevastyanov, D.V.; Volkova, V.S.; Zernitskaya, V.P.

[Text] / N. M. TCHEBAKOVA [et al.] // J. Biogeogr. - 1993. - Vol. 20, Is. 2. - P129-144, DOI 10.2307/2845667. - Cited References: 74 . - 16. - ISSN 0305-0270РУБ Ecology + Geography, Physical

Аннотация: A global vegetation model based on the climatological approach of Budyko is developed. The major vegetation zones of the world are predicted by a two-dimensional ordination of a Dryness Index and Potential Evaporation, which is derived from radiation balance. Mean temperature of the warmest month is also used to separate the Ice/Polar Desert, Tundra, and Taiga zones. Predictions of vegetation distributions are made using a global climate database interpolated to a 0.50 by 0.50 terrestrial grid. The overall impression from examining the resulting global vegetation map is that the modified Budyko model predicts the location and distribution of the world's vegetation fairly well. Comparison between model predictions and Olson's actual vegetation map were based on Kappa statistics and indicate good agreement for Ice/Polar Desert, Tundra, Taiga, and Desert (even though we predict too much Desert). Agreement with Olson's map was fair for predicting the specific location of Tropical Rain Forest and Tropical Savannas, and was good for predicting their general location at a larger scale. Agreement between Olson's map and model predictions were poor for Steppe, Temperate Forest, Tropical Seasonal Forest, and Xerophytic Shrubs, although the predictions for Temperate Forest and Tropical Seasonal Forest improved to fair at a larger scale for judging agreement. Agreement with the baseline map of Olson was poor for Steppe and Xerophytic Shrubs at all scales of comparison. Based on Kappa statistics, overall agreement between model predictions and Olson's map is between fair and good, depending on the scale of comparison. The model performed well in comparison to other global vegetation models. Apparently the calculation of radiation balance and the resulting Dryness Index and Potential Evaporation provides important information for predicting the distribution of the major vegetation zones of the world.

Abstract,
WOS

Держатели документа:
ACAD SCI,INST FOREST,ACADEMGORODOK,660036 KRASNOYARSK,RUSSIA
USDA,INTERMT RES STN,FOREST SERV,MOSCOW,ID 83843
NATL INST PUBL HLTH & ENVIRONM PROTECT,DEPT GLOBAL CHANGE,3720 BILTHOVEN,NETHERLANDS
INT INST APPL SYST ANAL,A-2361 LAXENBURG,AUSTRIA

Доп.точки доступа:
TCHEBAKOVA, N.M.; MONSERUD, R.A.; LEEMANS, R...; GOLOVANOV, S...

/ D. L. Musolin [et al.] // Baltic For. - 2017. - Vol. 23, Is. 1. - P316-333 . - ISSN 1392-1355
Аннотация: Four ash species are native to Russia (Fraxinus excelsior, F. angustifolia, F. chinensis, F. mandshurica) while F. pennsylvanica was introduced from North America. Ash forests cover 666 300 ha (0.1% of total forest area of Russia) and constitute a volume of 77.91 mln m3. Ash is widely used in the greening of populated places, around fields and along inter-city roads. We review the current situation with two recent invaders – ash dieback fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (Ascomycota) and emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera). Hymenoscyphus fraxineus was likely accidentally introduced from Asia to Western Europe, expanded its range eastward and by 2014 reached Moscow, whereas A. planipennis was accidentally introduced from Asia to Moscow Region, expanded its range in all directions but most noticeably southwards. By 2012, A. planipennis reached Smolensk Region bordering Belarus, and by 2013, Voronezh Region bordering Ukraine. At least between Belarus and Moscow city, the ranges of invaders overlap. Both species are a threat to the native as well as introduced ash in Europe. We list known records of two invaders in Russia (as of 2016) and for A. planipennis also review food plants, seasonal cycle, dispersal, parasitoids and susceptibility of different ash species. We analyze the synergetic effect of two invaders on ash in the area of overlapped ranges and potential losses of biological diversity associated with ash decline and conclude that the future of ash in Europe is precarious. The following directions of actions in Eurasia are proposed: (1) studies of resistance mechanisms to both agents in Asian ash species (first of all, F. chinensis and F. mandshurica) and hybrids between Asian and European or North-American ash species, (2) studies on selection of resistant ash forms and hybrids (to both agents), (3) controlled introduction of resistant Asian ash species, (4) slowing down of expansions of A. planipennis to Western Europe and H. fraxineus within Russia, (5) studies of natural control agents, (6) monitoring of invasions and sanitary condition of ash, and (7) studies on synergetic effect of H. fraxineus and A. planipennis on ash. © Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry.

Scopus

Держатели документа:
Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game Management, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, Institutskiy per., 5, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Department of Biogeography and Environmental Protection, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7-9, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Department of Selection, Reforestation and Chemical Thinning, Saint Petersburg Forestry Research Institute, Institutskiy av., 21, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Department of Forest Protection and Wood Science, Belarusian State Technological University, Sverdlova str., 13a, Minsk, Belarus
Department of Forest Zoology, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Federal Research Center «Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences», Akademgorodok 50, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

Доп.точки доступа:
Musolin, D. L.; Selikhovkin, A. V.; Shabunin, D. A.; Zviagintsev, V. B.; Baranchikov, Y. N.

/ M. Thurner [et al.] // Global Ecol. Biogeogr. - 2019. - Vol. 28, Is. 5. - P640-660, DOI 10.1111/geb.12883 . - ISSN 1466-822X
Аннотация: Aim: Information on the amount of carbon stored in the living tissue of tree stems (sapwood) is crucial for carbon and water cycle applications. Here, we aim to investigate sapwood-to-stem proportions and differences therein between tree genera and derive a sapwood biomass map. Location: Northern Hemisphere boreal and temperate forests. Time period: 2010. Major taxa studied: Twenty-five common tree genera. Methods: First, we develop a theoretical framework to estimate sapwood biomass for a given stem biomass by applying relationships between sapwood cross-sectional area (CSA) and stem CSA and between stem CSA and stem biomass. These measurements are extracted from a biomass and allometry database (BAAD), an extensive literature review and our own studies. The established allometric relationships are applied to a remote sensing-based stem biomass product in order to derive a spatially continuous sapwood biomass map. The application of new products on the distribution of stand density and tree genera facilitates the synergy of satellite and forest inventory data. Results: Sapwood-to-stem CSA relationships can be modelled with moderate to very high modelling efficiency for different genera. The total estimated sapwood biomass equals 12.87 ± 6.56 petagrams of carbon (PgC) in boreal (mean carbon density: 1.13 ± 0.58 kgC m ?2 ) and 15.80 ± 9.10 PgC in temperate (2.03 ± 1.17 kgC m ?2 ) forests. Spatial patterns of sapwood-to-stem biomass proportions are crucially driven by the distribution of genera (spanning from 20–30% in Larix to > 70% in Pinus and Betula forests). Main conclusions: The presented sapwood biomass map will be the basis for large-scale estimates of plant respiration and transpiration. The enormous spatial differences in sapwood biomass proportions reveal the need to consider the functionally more important sapwood instead of the entire stem biomass in global carbon and water cycle studies. Alterations in tree species distribution, induced by forest management or climate change, can strongly affect the available sapwood biomass even if stem biomass remains unchanged. © 2019 The Authors Global Ecology and Biogeography Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Scopus,
Смотреть статью,
WOS

Держатели документа:
Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany

Доп.точки доступа:
Thurner, M.; Beer, C.; Crowther, T.; Falster, D.; Manzoni, S.; Prokushkin, A.; Schulze, E. -D.

/ B. S. Steidinger [et al.] // Nature. - 2019. - Vol. 569, Is. 7756. - P404-+, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1128-0. - Cited References:45 . - ISSN 0028-0836. - ISSN 1476-4687РУБ Multidisciplinary Sciences

Аннотация: The identity of the dominant root-associated microbial symbionts in a forest determines the ability of trees to access limiting nutrients from atmospheric or soil pools(1,2), sequester carbon(3,4) and withstand the effects of climate change(5,6). Characterizing the global distribution of these symbioses and identifying the factors that control this distribution are thus integral to understanding the present and future functioning of forest ecosystems. Here we generate a spatially explicit global map of the symbiotic status of forests, using a database of over 1.1 million forest inventory plots that collectively contain over 28,000 tree species. Our analyses indicate that climate variables-in particular, climatically controlled variation in the rate of decomposition-are the primary drivers of the global distribution of major symbioses. We estimate that ectomycorrhizal trees, which represent only 2% of all plant species(7), constitute approximately 60% of tree stems on Earth. Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis dominates forests in which seasonally cold and dry climates inhibit decomposition, and is the predominant form of symbiosis at high latitudes and elevation. By contrast, arbuscular mycorrhizal trees dominate in aseasonal, warm tropical forests, and occur with ectomycorrhizal trees in temperate biomes in which seasonally warm-and-wet climates enhance decomposition. Continental transitions between forests dominated by ectomycorrhizal or arbuscular mycorrhizal trees occur relatively abruptly along climate-driven decomposition gradients; these transitions are probably caused by positive feedback effects between plants and microorganisms. Symbiotic nitrogen fixers-which are insensitive to climatic controls on decomposition (compared with mycorrhizal fungi)-are most abundant in arid biomes with alkaline soils and high maximum temperatures. The climatically driven global symbiosis gradient that we document provides a spatially explicit quantitative understanding of microbial symbioses at the global scale, and demonstrates the critical role of microbial mutualisms in shaping the distribution of plant species.

WOS,
Смотреть статью,
Scopus

Держатели документа:
Stanford Univ, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Zurich, Switzerland.
Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
Beijing Forestry Univ, Res Ctr Forest Management Engn, State Forestry & Grassland Adm, Beijing, Peoples R China.
Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford, England.
Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN USA.
Western Sydney Univ, Hawkesbury Inst Environm, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Univ Lleida, Dept Crop & Forest Sci, Agrotecnio Ctr UdL Agrotecnio, Lleida, Spain.
Forest Sci & Technol Ctr Catalonia CTFC, Solsona, Spain.
UN, Food & Agr Org, Rome, Italy.
Univ Montpellier, Cirad, UPR Forets & Soc, Montpellier, France.
Natl Polytech Inst INP HB, Dept Forestry & Environm, Yamoussoukro, Cote Ivoire.
Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res, WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Univ Felix Houphouet Boigny, UFR Biosci, Abidjan, Cote Ivoire.
Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Udine, Italy.
Natl Res Council CNR IBIMET, Inst Biometeorol, Florence, Italy.
Univ Florida, Dept Tourism Recreat & Sport Management, Spatial Ecol & Conservat Lab, Gainesville, FL USA.
UNAD, Fdn ConVida, Medellin, Colombia.
Field Museum Nat Hist, Chicago, IL 60605 USA.
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Trop Res, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Univ Gottingen, Silviculture & Forest Ecol Temperate Zones, Gottingen, Germany.
Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res NIBIO, Div Forest & Forest Resources, As, Norway.
Univ Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno, Museo Hist Nat Noel Kempff Mercado, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy.
Herbario Univ PORT, UNELLEZ Guanare, Programa Ciencias Agro & Mar, Portuguesa, Venezuela.
Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England.
Forest Res Inst, Dept Geomat, Raszyn, Poland.
Nat Biodivers Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands.
Univ Fed Acre, Ctr Multidisciplinar, Rio Branco, Brazil.
Smithsonians Natl Zoo & Conservat Biol Inst, Washington, DC USA.
Mbarara Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Trop Forest Conservat, Mbarara, Uganda.
Univ Ghent, Isotope Biosci Lab ISOFYS, Ghent, Belgium.
Stefan Cel Mare Univ Suceava, Integrated Ctr Res Dev & Innovat Adv Mat Nanotech, Suceava, Romania.
Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Forest Sci, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Bavarian State Inst Forestry, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Manchester, Lancs, England.
Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Biol Geobot & Bot Garden, Halle, Germany.
German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany.
Univ Firenze, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forest DAGRI, Florence, Italy.
Tomsk State Univ, Inst Biol, Tomsk, Russia.
Inst Forestry, Dept Spatial Regulat GIS & Forest Policy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Storrs, CT USA.
Univ Sunshine Coast, Trop Forests & People Res Ctr, Maroochydore, Qld, Australia.
Lakehead Univ, Fac Nat Resources Management, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Fujian Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Humid Subtrop Ecogeog Proc, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China.
Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Integrat Biol, Zurich, Switzerland.
IFER, Jilove, Czech Republic.
Global Change Res Inst CAS, Brno, Czech Republic.
Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Univ Missouri, Dept Biol, 8001 Nat Bridge Rd, St Louis, MO 63121 USA.
Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Biol, Dept Plant Biol, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Balboa, Panama.
Univ Cambridge, Dept Plant Sci, Cambridge, England.
Andes Amazon Biodivers Program, Madre De Dios, Peru.
Univ Juarez Estado Durango, Fac Ciencias Forestales, Durango, Mexico.
Coll St Rose, Dept Phys & Biol Sci, Albany, NY USA.
West Virginia Univ, Dept Biol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA.
Concordia Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
Univ Reg Blumenau, Dept Nat Sci, Blumenau, Brazil.
Cirad, UMR EcoFoG, Kourou, French Guiana.
Univ Maryland, Dept Geol Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA.
Inst Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia.
Natl Inst Amazonian Res, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Herbier Natl Gabon CENAREST, IRET, Libreville, Gabon.
Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Tucson, AZ USA.
Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA.
Queensland Herbarium, Dept Environm & Sci, Toowong, Qld, Australia.
Univ Natl Agr, Ecole Foresterie & Ingn Bois, Ketou, Benin.
Czech Acad Sci, Inst Entomol, Biol Ctr, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Geog, Exeter, Devon, England.
Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Joensuu, Finland.
Univ Bern, Inst Plant Sci, Bern, Switzerland.
Forest Res Inst Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Forest Resource Management, Umea, Sweden.
Fdn Edmund Mach, Dept Sustainable Agroecosyst & Bioresources, San Michele All Adige, Italy.
Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
Royal Bot Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland.
Univ Oxford, Dept Plant Sci, Oxford, England.
Univ Bayreuth, Dept Plant Systemat, Bayreuth, Germany.
Royal Soc Protect Birds, Ctr Conservat Sci, Sandy, Beds, England.
Inst Invest Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru.
Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Math Sci, Ctr Invas Biol, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
African Inst Math Sci, Theoret Ecol Unit, Cape Town, South Africa.
Korea Forest Promot Inst, Div Forest Resources Informat, Seoul, South Korea.
Inst Agron Neocaledonien IAC, Equipe Sol & Vegetat SolVeg, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Tokyo Univ Agr, Dept Forest Sci, Tokyo, Japan.
Polish Acad Sci, Inst Dendrol, Kornik, Poland.
Poznan Univ Life Sci, Dept Game Management & Forest Protect, Poznan, Poland.
Univ Warsaw, Bialowieza Geobot Stn, Fac Biol, Bialowieza, Poland.
Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Copenhagen, Denmark.
CSIRO Land & Water, Ctr Environm & Life Sci, Floreat, WA, Australia.
Bauman Moscow State Tech Univ, Fac Forestry, Mytishchi, Russia.
Univ Ghent, Dept Environm, CAVElab Computat & Appl Vegetat Ecol, Ghent, Belgium.
Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, CTFS ForestGEO, Balboa, Panama.
Colorado Mesa Univ, Dept Phys & Environm Sci, Grand Junction, CO USA.
Univ South Australia, Sch Nat & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Univ South Australia, Future Ind Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dr Harisingh Gour Cent Univ, Dept Bot, Sagar, India.
Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Forest Sci, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul Natl Univ, Interdisciplinary Program Agr & Forest Meteorol, Seoul, South Korea.
Natl Ctr Agro Meteorol, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr & Life Sci, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Agr, Kyoto, Japan.
Univ Hamburg, Inst World Forestry, Hamburg, Germany.
Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Forestry & Rural Engn, Tartu, Estonia.
Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Ecosyst Serv & Management, Laxenburg, Austria.
UCL, Dept Geog, London, England.
Qingdao Agr Univ, Fac Forestry, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China.
Russian Acad Sci, Ctr Forest Ecol & Prod, Moscow, Russia.
Univ Oxford, Sch Geog, Oxford, England.
AgroParisTech, UMR EcoFoG, Kourou, France.
Univ Estado Mato Grosso, Dept Ciencias Biol, Nova Xavantina, Brazil.
Univ York, Dept Environm & Geog, York, N Yorkshire, England.
Coll African Wildlife Management, Dept Wildlife Management, Mweka, Tanzania.
Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ecol & Recursos Nat, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Univ Tolima, Ibague, Colombia.
Colegio Profes Forestales Cochabamba, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Jardin Bot Missouri, Oxapampa, Peru.
Univ Nacl San Antonio Abad Cusco, Cuzco, Peru.
Independent Univ Bangladesh, Sch Environm Sci & Management, Dept Environm Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Univ Juarez Estado Durango, Inst Silvicultura Ind Madera, Durango, Mexico.
Univ Estatal Amazon, Puyo, Pastaza, Ecuador.
Univ Zurich, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tecnol Costa Rica TEC, Sch Forestry, Cartago, Costa Rica.
US Forest Serv, Climate Fire & Carbon Cycle Sci, USDA, Durham, NC USA.
Univ Quebec Montreal, Ctr Forest Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, FRC KSC, VN Sukachev Inst Forest, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
World Res Inst, Dept Forestry, Washington, DC USA.
Pondicherry Univ, Dept Ecol & Environm Sci, Pondicherry, India.
UNPA, INTA, CONICET, Rio Gallegos, Argentina.
Western Sydney Univ, Sch Social Sci & Psychol Urban Studies, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Inst Nacl de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Univ Fed Sul Bahia, Ctr Formacao Ciencias Agroflorestais, Lab Dendrol & Silvicultura Trop, Itabuna, Brazil.
Jardin Bot Medellin, Medellin, Colombia.
Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Life Sci, Chair Forest Growth & Yield Sci, Munich, Germany.
Univ Nacl Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru.
Fdn Con Vida & Corp COL TREE, SECC, Medellin, Colombia.
Boise State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Boise, ID 83725 USA.
MUSE Museo Sci, Trop Biodivers Sect, Trento, Italy.
Univ Florence, Dept Biol, Florence, Italy.
Cent Univ Jharkhand, Dept Environm Sci, Ranchi, Bihar, India.
Univ Freiburg, Geobot, Fac Biol, Freiburg, Germany.
Forest Res Inst Zvolen, Natl Forest Ctr, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Univ Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRA, Silva, Nancy, France.
Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Ctr Biodivers Dynam Changing World BIOCHANGE, Aarhus, Denmark.
Univ La Serena, Dept Biol, La Serena, Chile.
Univ Fed Acre, Ctr Ciencias Biol & Nat, Acre, Brazil.
Guyana Forestry Commiss, Georgetown, French Guiana.
Univ Brunei Darussalam, Fac Sci, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei.
Univ Yaounde, Dept Biol, Higher Teachers Training Coll, Plant Systemat & Ecol Lab, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Dept Ecol, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Sect Ecoinformat & Biodivers, Aarhus, Denmark.
Czech Univ Life Sci, Fac Forestry & Wood Sci, Prague, Czech Republic.
Free Univ Amsterdam, Syst Ecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Iwokrama Int Ctr Rainforest Conservat & Dev IIC, Georgetown, French Guiana.
Ural State Forest Engn Univ, Russian Acad Sci, Ural Branch, Bot Garden, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, LINCGlobal, Madrid, Spain.
Univ Leipzig, Inst Biol, Systemat Bot & Funct Biodivers, Leipzig, Germany.
Vietnamese Acad Forest Sci, Silviculture Res Inst, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Cirad, INRA,IRD,UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France.
Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Ctr Res & Technol Agroenvironm & Biol Sci, CITAB, UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal.
Polytech Inst Viseu, Agr High Sch, Viseu, Portugal.
Univ Estadual Campinas, Environm Studies & Res Ctr, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Forest & Wood Sci, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Hainan Univ, Sch Life & Pharmaceut Sci, Key Lab Trop Biol Resources, Minist Educ, Haikou, Hainan, Peoples R China.
West Virginia Univ, Div Forestry & Nat Resources, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA.
Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Geog & Geoecol, Dept Wetland Ecol, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ctr Agr Res Suriname CELOS, Paramaribo, Surinam.
Tropenbios Int, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Polish State Forests, Coordinat Ctr Environm Projects, Warsaw, Poland.
Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Biol, Programa Posgrad Biol Vegetal, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Univ Florida, Sch Forest Resources & Conservat, Spatial Ecol & Conservat Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
Flamingo Land Ltd, Kirby Misperton, England.
Univ Trento, Ctr Agr, Alimenti, Ambiente, San Michele All Adige, Italy.
Wild Chimpanzee Fdn, Liberia Off, Monrovia, Liberia.
Univ Mayor, Ctr Modelac & Monitoreo Ecosistemas, Santiago, Chile.
Univ La Frontera, Lab Biometria, Temuco, Chile.
Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Fac Environm Sci & Nat Resource Management, As, Norway.

Доп.точки доступа:
Steidinger, B. S.; Crowther, T. W.; Liang, J.; Van Nuland, M. E.; Werner, G. D. A.; Reich, P. B.; Nabuurs, S.; De-Miguel, M.; Zhou, N.; Picard, B.; Herault, X.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, D.; Routh, K. G.; Peay, K. G.; Abegg, Meinrad; Yao, C. Yves Adou; Alberti, Giorgio; Zambrano, Angelica Almeyda; Alvarez-Davila, Esteban; Alvarez-Loayza, Patricia; Alves, Luciana F.; Ammer, Christian; Anton-Fernandez, Clara; Araujo-Murakami, Alejandro; Arroyo, Luzmila; Avitabile, Valerio; Aymard, Gerardo; Baker, Timothy; Balazy, Radomir; Banki, Olaf; Barroso, Jorcely; Bastian, Meredith; Bastin, Jean-Francois; Birigazzi, Luca; Birnbaum, Philippe; Bitariho, Robert; Boeckx, Pascal; Bongers, Frans; Bouriaud, Olivier; Brancalion, Pedro H. S.; Brandl, Susanne; Brearley, Francis Q.; Brienen, Roel; Broadbent, Eben; Bruelheide, Helge; Bussotti, Filippo; Gatti, Roberto Cazzolla; Cesar, Ricardo; Cesljar, Goran; Chazdon, Robin; Chen, Han Y. H.; Chisholm, Chelsea; Cienciala, Emil; Clark, Connie J.; Clark, David; Colletta, Gabriel; Condit, Richard; Coomes, David; Valverde, S.; Corral-Rivas, Jose J.; Crim, Philip; Cumming, Jonathan; Dayanandan, Selvadurai; de Gasper, Andre L.; Decuyper, Mathieu; Derroire, Geraldine; DeVries, Ben; Djordjevic, Ilija; Ieda, Amaral; Dourdain, Aurelie; Obiang, Nestor Laurier Engone; Enquist, Brian; Eyre, Teresa; Fandohan, Adande Belarmain; Fayle, Tom M.; Feldpausch, Ted R.; Finer, Leena; Fischer, Markus; Fletcher, Christine; Fridman, Jonas; Frizzera, Lorenzo; Gamarra, Javier G. P.; Gianelle, Damiano; Glick, Henry B.; Harris, David; Hector, Andrew; Hemp, Andreas; Hengeveld, Geerten; Herbohn, John; Herold, Martin; Hillers, Annika; Coronado, A. M.; Huber, Markus; Hui, Cang; Cho, Hyunkook; Ibanez, Thomas; Jung, Ilbin; Imai, Nobuo; Jagodzinski, Andrzej M.; Jaroszewicz, Bogdan; Johannsen, Vivian; Joly, Carlos A.; Jucker, Tommaso; Karminov, Viktor; Kartawinata, Kuswata; Kearsley, Elizabeth; Kenfack, David; Kennard, Deborah; Kepfer-Rojas, Sebastian; Keppel, Gunnar; Khan, Mohammed Latif; Killeen, Timothy; Kim, Hyun Seok; Kitayama, Kanehiro; Kohl, Michael; Korjus, Henn; Kraxner, Florian; Laarmann, Diana; Lang, Mait; Lewis, Simon; Lu, Huicui; Lukina, Natalia; Maitner, Brian; Malhi, Yadvinder; Marcon, Eric; Marimon, Beatriz Schwantes; Marshall, Andrew Robert; Martin, Emanuel; Martynenko, Olga; Meave, Jorge A.; Melo-Cruz, Omar; Mendoza, Casimiro; Merow, Cory; Mendoza, Abel Monteagudo; Moreno, Vanessa; Mukul, Sharif A.; Mundhenk, Philip; Nava-Miranda, Maria G.; Neill, David; Neldner, Victor; Nevenic, Radovan; Ngugi, Michael; Niklaus, Pascal; Oleksyn, Jacek; Ontikov, Petr; Ortiz-Malavasi, Edgar; Pan, Yude; Paquette, Alain; Parada-Gutierrez, Alexander; Parfenova, Elena; Park, Minjee; Parren, Marc; Parthasarathy, Narayanaswamy; Peri, Pablo L.; Pfautsch, Sebastian; Phillips, Oliver; Piedade, Maria Teresa; Piotto, Daniel; Pitman, Nigel C. A.; Polo, Irina; Poorter, Lourens; Poulsen, Axel Dalberg; Poulsen, John R.; Pretzsch, Hans; Arevalo, Freddy Ramirez; Restrepo-Correa, Zorayda; Rodeghiero, Mirco; Rolim, Samir; Roopsind, Anand; Rovero, Francesco; Rutishauser, Ervan; Saikia, Purabi; Saner, Philippe; Schall, Peter; Schelhaas, Mart-Jan; Schepaschenko, Dmitry; Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael; Schmid, Bernhard; Schongart, Jochen; Searle, Eric; Seben, Vladimir; Serra-Diaz, Josep M.; Salas-Eljatib, Christian; Sheil, Douglas; Shvidenko, Anatoly; Silva-Espejo, Javier; Silveira, Marcos; Singh, James; Sist, Plinio; Slik, Ferry; Sonke, Bonaventure; Souza, Alexandre F.; Sterenczak, Krzysztof; Svenning, Jens-Christian; Svoboda, Miroslav; Targhetta, Natalia; Tchebakova, Nadja; ter Steege, Hans; Thomas, Raquel; Tikhonova, Elena; Umunay, Peter; Usoltsev, Vladimir; Valladares, Fernando; van der Plas, Fons; Do, B.; Martinez, S.; Verbeeck, Hans; Viana, Helder; Vieira, Simone; von Gadow, Klaus; Wang, Hua-Feng; Watson, James; Westerlund, Bertil; Wiser, Susan; Wittmann, Florian; Wortel, Verginia; Zagt, Roderick; Zawila-Niedzwiecki, Tomasz; Zhu, Zhi-Xin; Zo-Bi, Irie Casimir; Almeyda, Angelica; Herault, Bruno; ter, Hans

/ B. S. Steidinger [et al.] // Nature. - 2019. - Vol. 571, Is. 7765. - PE8, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1342-9 . - ISSN 0028-0836
Аннотация: In this Letter, the middle initial of author G. J. Nabuurs was omitted, and he should have been associated with an additional affiliation: ‘Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands’ (now added as affiliation 182). In addition, the following two statements have been added to the Supplementary Acknowledgements. (1): ‘We would particularly like to thank The French NFI for the work of the many field teams and engineers, who have made extraordinary efforts to make forest inventory data publicly available.’ (1): ‘Sergio de Miguel benefited from a Serra- Hunter Fellowship provided by the Generalitat of Catalonia.’ Finally, the second sentence of the Methods section should have cited the French NFI, which provided a national forestry database used in our analysis, to read as follows: ‘The GFBi database consists of individual-based data that we compiled from all the regional and national GFBi forest-inventory datasets, including the French NFI (IGN—French National Forest Inventory, raw data, annual campaigns 2005 and following, https://inventaire-forestier.ign.fr/spip.php?rubrique159, site accessed on 01 January 2015)’. All of these errors have been corrected online. © 2019, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Scopus,
Смотреть статью

Держатели документа:
Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
Research Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
Department of Crop and Forest Sciences - Agrotecnio Center (UdL-Agrotecnio), Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC), Solsona, Spain
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
Cirad, UPR Forets et Societes, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
Department of Forestry and Environment, National Polytechnic Institute (INP-HB), Yamoussoukro, Cote d'Ivoire
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
UFR Biosciences, University Felix Houphouet-Boigny, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire
Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
Institute of Biometeorology, National Research Council (CNR-IBIMET), Florence, Italy
Spatial Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Department of Tourism, Recreation and Sport Management, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
Fundacion ConVida, Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, UNAD, Medellin, Colombia
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, United States
Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany
Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), As, Norway
Museo de Historia Natural Noel Kempff Mercado, Universidad Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy
UNELLEZ-Guanare, Programa de Ciencias del Agro y el Mar, Herbario Universitario (PORT), Portuguesa, Venezuela
School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Raszyn, Poland
Naturalis Biodiversity Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
Centro Multidisciplinar, Universidade Federal do Acre, Rio Branco, Brazil
Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, United States
Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation, Mbarara University of Sciences and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
Isotope Bioscience Laboratory - ISOFYS, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Integrated Center for Research, Development and Innovation in Advanced Materials, Nanotechnologies, and Distributed Systems for Fabrication and Control (MANSiD), Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Suceava, Romania
Department of Forest Sciences, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Freising, Germany
Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forest (DAGRI), University of Firenze, Florence, Italy
Biological Institute, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
Department of Spatial Regulation, GIS and Forest Policy, Institute of Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
Tropical Forests and People Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia
Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Key Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Eco-Geographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China
Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
IFER - Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research, Jilove u Prahy, Czech Republic
Global Change Research Institute CAS, Brno, Czech Republic
Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St Louis, St Louis, MO, United States
Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Andes to Amazon Biodiversity Program, Madre de Dios, Peru
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Juarez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico
Department of Physical and Biological Sciences, The College of Saint Rose, Albany, NY, United States
Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
Biology Department, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Natural Science Department, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Blumenau, Brazil
Cirad, UMR EcoFoG, Kourou, French Guiana
Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
Institute of Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
National Institute of Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil
IRET, Herbier National du Gabon (CENAREST), Libreville, Gabon
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, United States
Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Herbarium, Toowong, QLD, Australia
Ecole de Foresterie et Ingenierie du Bois, Universite Nationale d’Agriculture, Ketou, Benin
Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Joensuu, Finland
Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU, Umea, Sweden
Department of Sustainable Agro-Ecosystems and Bioresources, Research and Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all’Adige, Italy
School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Department of Plant Systematics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
Centre for Conservation Science, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, United Kingdom
Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru
Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Theoretical Ecology Unit, African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
Division of Forest Resources Information, Korea Forest Promotion Institute, Seoul, South Korea
Institut Agronomique neo-Caledonien (IAC), Equipe Sol & Vegetation (SolVeg), Noumea, New Caledonia
Department of Forest Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan
Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kornik, Poland
Poznan University of Life Sciences, Department of Game Management and Forest Protection, Poznan, Poland
Faculty of Biology, Bialowieza Geobotanical Station, University of Warsaw, Bialowieza, Poland
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, CSIRO Land and Water, Floreat, WA, Australia
Forestry Faculty, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Mytischi, Russian Federation
CAVElab – Computational and Applied Vegetation Ecology, Department of Environment, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
CTFS-ForestGEO, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama
Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Colorado Mesa University, Grand Junction, CO, United States
School of Natural and Built Environments and Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Department of Botany, Dr Harisingh Gour Central University, Sagar, India
Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
National Center for Agro Meteorology, Seoul, South Korea
Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Institute for World Forestry, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
Ecosystems Services and Management, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
Department of Geography, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Faculty of Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China
Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
School of Geography, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
UMR EcoFoG, AgroParisTech, Kourou, France
Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Nova Xavantina, Brazil
Department of Environment & Geography, University of York, York, United Kingdom
Department of Wildlife Management, College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Tanzania
Departamento de Ecologia y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
Universidad del Tolima, Ibague, Colombia
Colegio de Profesionales Forestales de Cochabamba, Cochabamba, Bolivia
Jardin Botanico de Missouri, Oxapampa, Peru
Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Peru
Department of Environmental Management, School of Environmental Science and Management, Independent University Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juarez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico
Universidad Estatal Amazonica, Puyo, Pastaza, Ecuador
Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Forestry School, Tecnologico de Costa Rica TEC, Cartago, Costa Rica
Climate, Fire, and Carbon Cycle Sciences, USDA Forest Service, Durham, NC, United States
Centre for Forest Research, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
V. N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, FRC KSC, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Department of Forestry, World Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA), Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Rio Gallegos, Argentina
School of Social Sciences and Psychology (Urban Studies), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus, Brazil
Laboratorio de Dendrologia e Silvicultura Tropical, Centro de Formacao em Ciencias Agroflorestais, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Itabuna, Brazil
Jardin Botanico de Medellin, Medellin, Colombia
Chair for Forest Growth and Yield Science, TUM School for Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru
Servicios Ecosistemicos y Cambio Climatico (SECC), Fundacion Con Vida & Corporacion COL-TREE, Medellin, Colombia
Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States
Tropical Biodiversity Section, MUSE - Museo delle Scienze, Trento, Italy
Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Department of Environmental Sciences, Central University of Jharkhand, Ranchi, India
Faculty of Biology, Geobotany, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
National Forest Centre, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
Universite de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, Inra, Silva, Nancy, France
Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Departamento de Biologia, Universidad de la Serena, La Serena, Chile
Centro de Ciencias Biologicas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal do Acre, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil
Guyana Forestry Commission, Georgetown, French Guiana
Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam
Plant Systematic and Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Higher Teachers’ Training College, University of Yaounde, Yaounde, Cameroon
Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
Systems Ecology, Free University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Iwokrama International Centre for Rainforest Conservation and Development (IIC), Georgetown, French Guiana
Botanical Garden of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural State Forest Engineering University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
LINCGlobal, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
Silviculture Research Institute, Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Cirad, UMR-AMAP, CNRS, INRA, IRD, Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, CITAB, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal
Agricultural High School, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal
Environmental Studies and Research Center, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
Department of Forest and Wood Science, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Key Laboratory of Tropical Biological Resources, Ministry of Education, School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou, China
Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
Manaaki Whenua–Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
Department of Wetland Ecology, Institute for Geography and Geoecology, Karlsruhe Institute for Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Centre for Agricultural Research in Suriname (CELOS), Paramaribo, Suriname
Tropenbios International, Wageningen, Netherlands
Polish State Forests, Coordination Center for Environmental Projects, Warsaw, Poland
Programa de Pos-graduacao em Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Spatial Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
Flamingo Land Ltd, Kirby Misperton, United Kingdom
Centro Agricoltura, Alimenti, Ambiente, University of Trento, San Michele all’Adige, Italy
Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Liberia Office, Monrovia, Liberia
Centro de Modelacion y Monitoreo de Ecosistemas, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile
Laboratorio de Biometria, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway
Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Resaerch, Wageningen, Netherlands

Доп.точки доступа:
Steidinger, B. S.; Crowther, T. W.; Liang, J.; Van Nuland, M. E.; Werner, G. D.A.; Reich, P. B.; Nabuurs, G. J.; de-Miguel, S.; Zhou, M.; Picard, N.; Herault, B.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, C.; Routh, D.; Peay, K. G.; Abegg, M.; Adou Yao, C. Y.; Alberti, G.; Almeyda Zambrano, A.; Alvarez-Davila, E.; Alvarez-Loayza, P.; Alves, L. F.; Ammer, C.; Anton-Fernandez, C.; Araujo-Murakami, A.; Arroyo, L.; Avitabile, V.; Aymard, G.; Baker, T.; Balazy, R.; Banki, O.; Barroso, J.; Bastian, M.; Bastin, J. -F.; Birigazzi, L.; Birnbaum, P.; Bitariho, R.; Boeckx, P.; Bongers, F.; Bouriaud, O.; Brancalion, P. H.S.; Brandl, S.; Brearley, F. Q.; Brienen, R.; Broadbent, E.; Bruelheide, H.; Bussotti, F.; Cazzolla Gatti, R.; Cesar, R.; Cesljar, G.; Chazdon, R.; Chen, H. Y.H.; Chisholm, C.; Cienciala, E.; Clark, C. J.; Clark, D.; Colletta, G.; Condit, R.; Coomes, D.; Cornejo Valverde, F.; Corral-Rivas, J. J.; Crim, P.; Cumming, J.; Dayanandan, S.; de Gasper, A. L.; Decuyper, M.; Derroire, G.; DeVries, B.; Djordjevic, I.; Ieda, A.; Dourdain, A.; Obiang, N. L.E.; Enquist, B.; Eyre, T.; Fandohan, A. B.; Fayle, T. M.; Feldpausch, T. R.; Finer, L.; Fischer, M.; Fletcher, C.; Fridman, J.; Frizzera, L.; Gamarra, J. G.P.; Gianelle, D.; Glick, H. B.; Harris, D.; Hector, A.; Hemp, A.; Hengeveld, G.; Herbohn, J.; Herold, M.; Hillers, A.; Honorio Coronado, E. N.; Huber, M.; Hui, C.; Cho, H.; Ibanez, T.; Jung, I.; Imai, N.; Jagodzinski, A. M.; Jaroszewicz, B.; Johannsen, V.; Joly, C. A.; Jucker, T.; Karminov, V.; Kartawinata, K.; Kearsley, E.; Kenfack, D.; Kennard, D.; Kepfer-Rojas, S.; Keppel, G.; Khan, M. L.; Killeen, T.; Kim, H. S.; Kitayama, K.; Kohl, M.; Korjus, H.; Kraxner, F.; Laarmann, D.; Lang, M.; Lewis, S.; Lu, H.; Lukina, N.; Maitner, B.; Malhi, Y.; Marcon, E.; Marimon, B. S.; Marimon-Junior, B. H.; Marshall, A. R.; Martin, E.; Martynenko, O.; Meave, J. A.; Melo-Cruz, O.; Mendoza, C.; Merow, C.; Monteagudo Mendoza, A.; Moreno, V.; Mukul, S. A.; Mundhenk, P.; Nava-Miranda, M. G.; Neill, D.; Neldner, V.; Nevenic, R.; Ngugi, M.; Niklaus, P.; Oleksyn, J.; Ontikov, P.; Ortiz-Malavasi, E.; Pan, Y.; Paquette, A.; Parada-Gutierrez, A.; Parfenova, E.; Park, M.; Parren, M.; Parthasarathy, N.; Peri, P. L.; Pfautsch, S.; Phillips, O.; Piedade, M. T.; Piotto, D.; Pitman, N. C.A.; Polo, I.; Poorter, L.; Poulsen, A. D.; Poulsen, J. R.; Pretzsch, H.; Ramirez Arevalo, F.; Restrepo-Correa, Z.; Rodeghiero, M.; Rolim, S.; Roopsind, A.; Rovero, F.; Rutishauser, E.; Saikia, P.; Saner, P.; Schall, P.; Schelhaas, M. -J.; Schepaschenko, D.; Scherer-Lorenzen, M.; Schmid, B.; Schongart, J.; Searle, E.; Seben, V.; Serra-Diaz, J. M.; Salas-Eljatib, C.; Sheil, D.; Shvidenko, A.; Silva-Espejo, J.; Silveira, M.; Singh, J.; Sist, P.; Slik, F.; Sonke, B.; Souza, A. F.; Sterenczak, K.; Svenning, J. -C.; Svoboda, M.; Targhetta, N.; Tchebakova, N.; Steege, H.; Thomas, R.; Tikhonova, E.; Umunay, P.; Usoltsev, V.; Valladares, F.; van der Plas, F.; Van Do, T.; Vasquez Martinez, R.; Verbeeck, H.; Viana, H.; Vieira, S.; von Gadow, K.; Wang, H. -F.; Watson, J.; Westerlund, B.; Wiser, S.; Wittmann, F.; Wortel, V.; Zagt, R.; Zawila-Niedzwiecki, T.; Zhu, Z. -X.; Zo-Bi, I. C.; , U - GFBI consortium

/ N. Kirichenko [et al.] // Zootaxa. - 2019. - Vol. 4652, Is. 1. - P1-55, DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.4652.1.1. - Cited References:116. - We thank the reviewers Svetlana Baryshnikova (Russia), Shigeki Kobayashi (Japan) and a third anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments, David Lees (UK) and Erik J. van Nieukerken (The Netherlands) for helping to improve the manuscript, Jurate De Prins (Belgium) for early editing and useful suggestions. We also thank our colleagues Peter Zorikov, Pavel Ostrogradsky (Gornotaezhnoe, Russia), Alexander Taran (Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia), the directorate and the foresters of the National Park "Zov Tigra" (Primorskii Krai, Russia) for their cooperation, Andrei Kirichenko (Komsomolsk-na-Amure, Russia) for assistance in the field, Irina Mikhailova (Krasnoayrsk, Russia) for help with map construction, Yuri Baranchikov (Krasnoyarsk, Russia) for support at different stages of the study. This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (projects nos 15-29-02645-ofi_m and 19-04-01029-A), LE STUDIUM (R) fellowship program, Institute for advanced studies-Loire Valley (Orleans, France), the French Embassy in Russia, Bourse Metchnikov (grant no. 908981L, Campus France) and Cost Action FP1401-A global network of nurseries as early warning system against alien tree pests (Global Warning). . - ISSN 1175-5326. - ISSN 1175-5334РУБ Zoology

Аннотация: The Russian Far East (RFE) is an important hotspot of biodiversity whose insect fauna remains understudied, particularly its Microlepidoptera. Here we explore the diversity of leaf-mining micromoths of the family Gracillariidae, their distribution and host plant associations in RFE using a combination of field observations and sampling, DNA barcoding, morphological analysis and literature review. We collected 91 gracillariid specimens (45 larvae, 9 pupae and 37 adults) in 12 localities across RFE and identified 34 species using a combination of DNA barcoding and morphology. We provide a genetic library of 57 DNA barcodes belonging to 37 Barcode Index Numbers (BINs), including four BINs that could potentially represent species new to science. Leaf mines and leaf shelters are described and illustrated for 32 studied species, male or female genitalia as well as forewing patterns of adults are shown, especially for those species identified based on morphology. Three species, Micrurapteryx caraganella (Hering), Callisto insperatella (Nickerl), and Phyllonorycter junoniella (Zeller) are newly recorded from RFE. Five species previously known from some regions of RFE, were found for the first time in Amurskaya Oblast: Phyllonorycter populifoliella (Treitschke), Primorskii Krai: Ph. sorbicola Kumata and Sahkalin Island: Caloptilia heringi Kumata, Ph. ermani (Kumata) and Ph. ulmifoliella (Hubner). Eight gracillariid-plant associations are novel to science: Caloptilia gloriosa Kumata on Acer pseudosieboldianum, Cameraria niphonica Kumata on A. caudatum subsp. ukurundense, Parornix ermolaevi Kuznetzov on Corylus sieboldiana, Phyllonorycter ermani (Kumata) on Betula platyphylla, Ph. nipponicella (Issiki) on Quercus mongolica, Ph. orientalis (Kumata) and Ph. pseudojezoniella Noreika on Acer saccharum, Ph. sorbicola on Prunus maakii. For the first time we documented the "green island" phenotype on Phyllonorycter cavella (Zeller) mines on Betula platyphylla. Two pestiferous species have been recorded during our surveys: Micrurapteryx caraganella on ornamental Caragana arborescens in urban plantations in Amurskaya Oblast, and the lime leafminer Phyllonorycter issikii (Kumata), a species known to be native to RFE and invasive elsewhere in Russia and in European countries. A revised checklist of RFE gracillariids has been compiled. It accounts for 135 species among which 17 species (13%) are only known to occur in RFE. The gracillariid fauna of RFE is more similar to the Japanese fauna (49%), than to the fauna of the rest of Russia (i.e European part and Siberia) (32%).

WOS,
Смотреть статью,
Scopus

Держатели документа:
SB RAS, Sukachev Inst Forest, Fed Res Ctr, Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia.
INRA, Zool Forestiere UR0633, F-45075 Orleans, France.
Museo Civ Storia Nat, I-37129 Verona, Italy.
Russian Plant Quarantine Ctr, Krasnoyarsk Branch, Krasnoyarsk 660075, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Far Eastern Branch, Fed Sci Ctr East Asian Terr Biodivers, Vladivostok 690022, Russia.
Far Eastern Fed Univ, Vladivostok 690922, Russia.
Komarov Mt Taiga Stn FEB RAS, Gornotaezhnoe 692533, Russia.
Bot Garden Inst FEB RAS, Sakhalin Branch, Yuzhno Sakhalinsk 693032, Russia.
Kyoto Prefectural Univ, Dept Life & Environm Sci, Kyoto 6068522, Japan.
Univ Tours, UFR Sci & Tech, CNRS, IRBI,UMR 7261, F-37200 Tours, France.

Доп.точки доступа:
Kirichenko, Natalia; Triberti, Paolo; Akulow, Evgeniy; Ponomarenko, Margarita; Gorokhova, Svetlana; Sheiko, Viktor; Ohshima, Issei; Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Russian Foundation for Basic Research [15-29-02645-ofi_m, 19-04-01029-A]; LE STUDIUM(R) fellowship program, Institute for advanced studies-Loire Valley (Orleans, France); French Embassy in Russia, Bourse Metchnikov [908981L]; Cost Action global network of nurseries as early warning system against alien tree pests (Global Warning) [FP1401-A]

/ N. I. Kirichenko [et al.] // Far East. Entomol. - 2019. - Vol. 390. - P19-32, DOI 10.25221/fee.390.3 . - ISSN 1026-051X
Аннотация: Distribution data of Tilia-feeding Phyllonorycter in the Russian Far East have been retrieved from a century-old Tilia herbarium stored in Vladivostok. Overall, 280 typical mines of Phyllonorycter, some with larvae and pupae, were found on 61 out of 799 herbarized specimens of Tilia spp. collected in Khabarovskii krai and Primorskii krai. For the first time, the presence of Tilia-feeding Phyllonorycter has been documented in Amurskaya oblast and Jewish Autonomous oblast. High densities of the leafminer have been recorded on Tilia amurensis sampled in Khabarovskii krai and Primorskii krai between 1937 and 2005 suggesting a population dynamics with recurrent outbreaks. Our results confirm the importance of historical herbarium collections in studying trophic interactions and invasion ecology of folivore organisms. © 2019 Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.

Scopus,
Смотреть статью

Держатели документа:
Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS, Federal Research Center 'Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS', Akademgorodok, 50/28, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russian Federation
Siberian Federal University, Svobodny Prospect, 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation
All-Russian Plant Quarantine Center, Krasnoyarsk branch, Maerchaka str., 31a, Krasnoyarsk, 660075, Russian Federation
Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690022, Russian Federation
Far Eastern Federal University, bld. L, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922, Russian Federation
INRA, UR0633 Zoologie Forestiere, Orleans, F-45075, France
Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte (IRBI), UMR 7261, CNRS/Universite de Tours, UFR Sciences et Techniques, Tours, 37200, France

Доп.точки доступа:
Kirichenko, N. I.; Akulov, E. N.; Babichev, N. S.; Mikhailova, I. A.; Ponomarenko, M. G.; Lopez-Vaamonde, C.

/ S. F. Gouveia, J. G. Rubalcaba, V. Soukhovolsky [et al.] // Ecol. Model. - 2020. - Vol. 424. - Ст. 109032, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109032. - Cited References:58. - We thank the kind audience of the Symposium `Applications of theoretical physics in ecology' during the 22nd Biennial Conference of The International Society for Ecological Modelling (ISEM), at Salzburg, Austria, for their feedback to the talks that resulted in this work. This work was supported by an Institute Serrapilheira grant provided to SFG (G-1709-18372) and INCT Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation of Biodiversity -EECBio (CNPq/FAPEG, grant 380733/2017-0). SFG also thanks CNPq (grants 451863/2019-4, 303180/2016-1, and 402469/2016-0) and CAPES/FAPITEC (grants 88881.157451/2017-01 and 88881.157961/2017-01). The work of VS and OT is supported by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (grant 18-04-00119), and the work of RR by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness (grant CGL2016-76747-R) and ERDF Funds. . - ISSN 0304-3800. - ISSN 1872-7026РУБ Ecology

Аннотация: Physics and ecology focus on different domains of nature and have developed under distinct scientific paradigms. Still, both share critical features, such as dealing with systems of irreducible complexity and inherent uncertainty at a fundamental level. Physics has embraced such complexity earlier and has devised robust analytical approaches to describe general principles of its systems, a path that ecosystem ecology has tracked, but organism-based ecology has only started to. Here, we outline approaches from physics - from classical to quantum mechanics - to address ecological questions that deal with emergent patterns of biodiversity, such as species' distribution, niche, and trait variation, which are of particular interest to community ecology, biogeography, and macroecology. These approaches can be further extended, which would provide these fields with a rationale common to other scientific fields within and outside ecology.

WOS

Держатели документа:
Univ Fed Sergipe, Dept Ecol, Sao Cristovao, Sergipe, Brazil.
Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
VN Sukachev Inst Forest SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Univ Evora CIBIO InBIO UE, Res Ctr Biodivers & Genet Resources, Evora, Portugal.
Univ Malaga, Fac Sci, Dept Anim Biol, Biogeog Divers & Conservat Res Team, Malaga, Spain.

Доп.точки доступа:
Gouveia, Sidney F.; Rubalcaba, Juan G.; Soukhovolsky, Vladislav; Tarasova, Olga; Barbosa, A. Marcia; Real, Raimundo; Institute Serrapilheira [G-1709-18372]; INCT Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation of Biodiversity -EECBio (CNPq/FAPEG) [380733/2017-0]; CNPqNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [451863/2019-4, 303180/2016-1, 402469/2016-0]; CAPES/FAPITEC [88881.157451/2017-01, 88881.157961/2017-01]; Russian Foundation of Basic ResearchRussian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [18-04-00119]; Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness [CGL2016-76747-R]; ERDF Funds

/ S. F. Gouveia, J. G. Rubalcaba, V. Soukhovolsky [et al.] // Ecol. Model. - 2020. - Vol. 424. - Ст. 109032, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109032 . - ISSN 0304-3800
Аннотация: Physics and ecology focus on different domains of nature and have developed under distinct scientific paradigms. Still, both share critical features, such as dealing with systems of irreducible complexity and inherent uncertainty at a fundamental level. Physics has embraced such complexity earlier and has devised robust analytical approaches to describe general principles of its systems, a path that ecosystem ecology has tracked, but organism-based ecology has only started to. Here, we outline approaches from physics – from classical to quantum mechanics – to address ecological questions that deal with emergent patterns of biodiversity, such as species’ distribution, niche, and trait variation, which are of particular interest to community ecology, biogeography, and macroecology. These approaches can be further extended, which would provide these fields with a rationale common to other scientific fields within and outside ecology. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Scopus

Держатели документа:
Department of Ecology, Federal University of Sergipe, Sao Cristovao, Sergipe, Brazil
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, United States
V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University Evora (CIBIO/InBIO-UE), Evora, Portugal
Biogeography, Diversity and Conservation Research Team, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain

Доп.точки доступа:
Gouveia, S. F.; Rubalcaba, J. G.; Soukhovolsky, V.; Tarasova, O.; Barbosa, A. M.; Real, R.

/ V. I. Kharuk, S. T. Im, I. A. Petrov [et al.] // Global Ecol. Biogeogr. - 2020, DOI 10.1111/geb.13243 . - Article in press. - ISSN 1466-822X
Аннотация: Aim: An increase in conifer mortality has been observed widely across the boreal forest biome. We investigate the causes of this mortality, in addition to the geospatial and temporal dynamics of mortality, in Siberian pine and fir stands. Location: Central Siberia. Time period: 1950–2018. Major taxa studied: Pinus sibirica Du Tour and Abies sibirica Ledeb. Methods: We used geospatial analysis of satellite-derived (MODIS, Landsat) data, topography (elevation, slope steepness and exposure) and climatic variables [precipitation, thermal degree days (TDD = ?(t > 0 °C), standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and root zone moisture content (RZM)], together with in situ data. Dendrochronology was applied for analysis of the radial growth increment (GI). Results: Siberian pine and fir mortality has increased greatly in recent decades. The mortality of forest stands and trees was dependent on the TDD, RZM and SPEI. Mortality occurred mainly within the southern part of the species ranges and decreased northward, correlated with latitudinal gradients of TDD and SPEI. Mortality was observed mostly at elevations < 1,000 m and decreased with increasing elevation, whereas the area of forests and GI of trees increased with elevation. Forest mortality was preceded by the changes in tree GI. Since the onset of climate warming, GI increased until a breakpoint in the mid-1980s. Further temperature increase caused a reduction in GI owing to moisture stress and division of the tree population into “decliners” and “survivors”. Mortality was caused by the combined impact of moisture stress and bark beetle attacks. Main conclusion: Siberian pine and fir mortality was preceded by a reduction in the GI of trees caused by elevated air temperatures, acute droughts and subsequent insect attacks. Forest mortality was observed mostly at low elevations, whereas within the areas with sufficient moisture availability (at elevations c. < 1,000 m) the tree GI and forest area increased. With the projected increase in drought, Siberian pine and fir trees are predicted to retreat from their southern low-elevation ranges. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Scopus

Держатели документа:
Sukachev Institute of Forest, subdivision of the Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
GIS Chair, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Space Instruments and Technologies Chair, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

Доп.точки доступа:
Kharuk, V. I.; Im, S. T.; Petrov, I. A.; Dvinskaya, M. L.; Shushpanov, A. S.; Golyukov, A. S.

/ V. I. Kharuk, S. T. Im, I. A. Petrov [et al.] // Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. - 2020, DOI 10.1111/geb.13243. - Cited References:56. - RFBR, Krasnoyarsk Territory and Krasnoyarsk Regional Fund of Science, Grant/Award Number: 18-05-00432 and 18-45-240003 . - Article in press. - ISSN 1466-822X. - ISSN 1466-8238РУБ Ecology + Geography, Physical

Аннотация: Aim An increase in conifer mortality has been observed widely across the boreal forest biome. We investigate the causes of this mortality, in addition to the geospatial and temporal dynamics of mortality, in Siberian pine and fir stands. Location Central Siberia. Time period 1950-2018. Major taxa studied Pinus sibirica Du Tour and Abies sibirica Ledeb. Methods We used geospatial analysis of satellite-derived (MODIS, Landsat) data, topography (elevation, slope steepness and exposure) and climatic variables [precipitation, thermal degree days (TDD = n-ary sumation (t > 0 degrees C), standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and root zone moisture content (RZM)], together with in situ data. Dendrochronology was applied for analysis of the radial growth increment (GI). Results Siberian pine and fir mortality has increased greatly in recent decades. The mortality of forest stands and trees was dependent on the TDD, RZM and SPEI. Mortality occurred mainly within the southern part of the species ranges and decreased northward, correlated with latitudinal gradients of TDD and SPEI. Mortality was observed mostly at elevations < 1,000 m and decreased with increasing elevation, whereas the area of forests and GI of trees increased with elevation. Forest mortality was preceded by the changes in tree GI. Since the onset of climate warming, GI increased until a breakpoint in the mid-1980s. Further temperature increase caused a reduction in GI owing to moisture stress and division of the tree population into "decliners" and "survivors". Mortality was caused by the combined impact of moisture stress and bark beetle attacks. Main conclusion Siberian pine and fir mortality was preceded by a reduction in the GI of trees caused by elevated air temperatures, acute droughts and subsequent insect attacks. Forest mortality was observed mostly at low elevations, whereas within the areas with sufficient moisture availability (at elevations c. < 1,000 m) the tree GI and forest area increased. With the projected increase in drought, Siberian pine and fir trees are predicted to retreat from their southern low-elevation ranges.

WOS

Держатели документа:
Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr, Sukachev Inst Forest,Subdiv Fed Res Ctr, Academgorodok 50-28, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, GIS Chair, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Reshetnev Siberian State Univ Sci & Technol, Space Instruments & Technol Chair, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Доп.точки доступа:
Kharuk, Viacheslav, I; Im, Sergei T.; Petrov, Il'ya A.; Dvinskaya, Maria L.; Shushpanov, Alexandr S.; Golyukov, Alexei S.; RFBRRussian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR); Krasnoyarsk Territory; Krasnoyarsk Regional Fund of Science [18-05-00432, 18-45-240003]

/ M. A. Polezhaeva, N. A. Tikhonova, E. A. Marchuk [et al.] // J. Plant Res. - 2021, DOI 10.1007/s10265-020-01241-9 . - Article in press. - ISSN 0918-9440
Аннотация: The vast territory of East Asia, including southwestern Beringia, is considered to have been almost ice free during the Pleistocene. Cold-resistant flora may have persisted in this region expanding or contracting its range during the climate cooling. Only a few plant genera have been studied with a sampling area across their entire geographic range in East Asia; therefore, the understanding of the biogeographic history of alpine flora in this region remains limited. In the present study, genetic variation and population structure in 21 populations of the alpine shrub Rhododendron aureum across its range in East Asia were assessed using 18 microsatellite loci. Phylogenetic analyses revealed three main genetic groups: Siberia, Northeast, and North Pacific. According to the geographical pattern of genetic diversity, the North Pacific group includes populations from Kamchatka, south of Russian Far East, and territories close to central Japan. This group is the most diverse and likely diverged earlier than the Siberia and Northeast groups. Ecological niche modeling predicts range expansion of this species during the period of cooling and, together with demographic history, suggests that the divergence between the three main genetic groups predated the Last Glacial Maximum. Similar to other cold-resistant species such as Larix sibirica and Juniperus communis, the pattern of genetic diversity of R. aureum supports the survival of the species at high latitudes during the Pleistocene with limited contribution of the southern populations to expansion of the species range to the Northeast region and Siberia. © 2021, The Botanical Society of Japan.

Scopus

Держатели документа:
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
V. N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Botanical Garden-Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russian Federation
Institute of the Biological Problems of the North, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Magadan, Russian Federation
Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation

Доп.точки доступа:
Polezhaeva, M. A.; Tikhonova, N. A.; Marchuk, E. A.; Modorov, M. V.; Ranyuk, M. N.; Polezhaev, A. N.; Badmayeva, N. K.; Semerikov, V. L.

/ M. A. Polezhaeva, N. A. Tikhonova, E. A. Marchuk [et al.] // J. Plant Res. - 2021, DOI 10.1007/s10265-020-01241-9. - Cited References:77. - We are grateful to A. Berkutenko, D. Krivenko, A. Shirayev, L. Andriyanova, M. Khoreva, P. Krestov, T. Polyakova, A. Efimova, N. Molokova for the help with material collections. We thank V. Mikryukov for the help with MAXENT figures presentation. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. The collection of samples was supported by the State Contract of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, UB RAS. The laboratory treatments were supported by the Russian Science Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 20-04-00417 A). . - Article in press. - ISSN 0918-9440. - ISSN 1618-0860РУБ Plant Sciences

Аннотация: The vast territory of East Asia, including southwestern Beringia, is considered to have been almost ice free during the Pleistocene. Cold-resistant flora may have persisted in this region expanding or contracting its range during the climate cooling. Only a few plant genera have been studied with a sampling area across their entire geographic range in East Asia; therefore, the understanding of the biogeographic history of alpine flora in this region remains limited. In the present study, genetic variation and population structure in 21 populations of the alpine shrub Rhododendron aureum across its range in East Asia were assessed using 18 microsatellite loci. Phylogenetic analyses revealed three main genetic groups: Siberia, Northeast, and North Pacific. According to the geographical pattern of genetic diversity, the North Pacific group includes populations from Kamchatka, south of Russian Far East, and territories close to central Japan. This group is the most diverse and likely diverged earlier than the Siberia and Northeast groups. Ecological niche modeling predicts range expansion of this species during the period of cooling and, together with demographic history, suggests that the divergence between the three main genetic groups predated the Last Glacial Maximum. Similar to other cold-resistant species such as Larix sibirica and Juniperus communis, the pattern of genetic diversity of R. aureum supports the survival of the species at high latitudes during the Pleistocene with limited contribution of the southern populations to expansion of the species range to the Northeast region and Siberia.

WOS

Держатели документа:
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Plant & Anim Ecol, Ural Branch, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, VN Sukachev Inst Forest, Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Bot Garden Inst, Far Eastern Branch, Vladivostok, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biol Problems North, Far Eastern Branch, Magadan, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Gen & Expt Biol, Siberian Branch, Ulan Ude, Russia.

Доп.точки доступа:
Polezhaeva, Maria A.; Tikhonova, Natalya A.; Marchuk, Elena A.; Modorov, Makar, V; Ranyuk, Maryana N.; Polezhaev, Alexey N.; Badmayeva, Natalya K.; Semerikov, Vladimir L.; State Contract of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, UB RAS; Russian Science Foundation for Basic ResearchRussian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [20-04-00417 A]

/ J. C. Andersen, N. P. Havill, B. P. Griffin [et al.] // Front. Biogeogr. - 2021. - Vol. 13, Is. 1. - P1-14, DOI 10.21425/F5FBG49581 . - ISSN 1948-6596
Аннотация: The frequency and severity of outbreaks by pestiferous insects is increasing globally, likely as a result of human-mediated introductions of non-native organisms. However, it is not always apparent whether an outbreak is the result of a recent introduction of an evolutionarily naive population, or of recent disturbance acting on an existing population that arrived previously during natural range expansion. Here we use approximate Bayesian computation to infer the colonization history of a pestiferous insect, the winter moth, Operophtera brumata L. (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), which has caused widespread defoliation in northern Fennoscandia. We generated genotypes using a suite of 24 microsatellite loci and find that populations of winter moth in northern Europe can be assigned to five genetically distinct clusters that correspond with 1) Iceland, 2) the British Isles, 3) Central Europe and southern Fennoscandia, 4) Eastern Europe, and 5) northern Fennoscandia. We find that the northern Fennoscandia winter moth cluster is most closely related to a population presently found in the British Isles, and that these populations likely diverged around 2,900 years ago. This result suggests that current outbreaks are not the result of a recent introduction, but rather that recent climate or habitat disturbance is acting on existing populations that may have arrived to northern Fennoscandia via pre-Roman traders from the British Isles, and/or by natural dispersal across the North Sea likely using the Orkney Islands of northern Scotland as a stepping-stone before dispersing up the Norwegian coast. © 2021. The authors, CC-BY 4.0 license.

Scopus

Держатели документа:
Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Hamden, Connecticut 06514, United States
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, FRAM High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, Tromso, NO-9296, Norway
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Svanhovd, SvanvikNO-9925, Norway
Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, FI-20014, Finland
Faculty of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, Arleyni 22, Reykjavik, IS-112, Iceland
Department of Bioscience and Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Ronde, DK-8410, Denmark
41 Royal Crescent, London, W11 4SN, United Kingdom
Department of Forest Zoology, Sukachev Institute of Forest FRC KSC, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russian Federation
Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game Management, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russian Federation
Department of Biogeography & Environmental Protection, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7-9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, PO Box 6050 Langnes, Tromso, N-9037, Norway
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States

Доп.точки доступа:
Andersen, J. C.; Havill, N. P.; Griffin, B. P.; Jepsen, J. U.; Hagen, S. B.; Klemola, T.; Barrio, I. C.; Kjeldgaard, S. A.; Hoye, T. T.; Murlis, J.; Baranchikov, Y. N.; Selikhovkin, A. V.; Vindstad, O. P.L.; Caccone, A.; Elkinton, J. S.

/ D. L. Musolin, A. V. Selikhovkin, E. Y. Peregudova [et al.] // Forests. - 2021. - Vol. 12, Is. 4. - Ст. 502, DOI 10.3390/f12040502 . - ISSN 1999-4907
Аннотация: Agrilus planipennis is a devastating invasive pest of ash trees in European Russia, Ukraine, and North America. To monitor the north-western limit of its European invasive range, in June 2018 we established 10 study plots along the federal highway M10 (Russia) that runs between Moscow and Saint Petersburg through Tver’ City (approx. 180 km from Moscow), and lined with ash trees. On each plot, 2–4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica trees with heights ranging 6.1–17.0 m and diameters ranging 7.0–18.0 cm were girdled, i.e., 50 cm of their bark were removed. The study plots were visited and girdled trees were examined in September and November, 2018, and in October, 2019. Observations revealed that the current continuous north-western limit of A. planipennis range in European Russia coincides with the north-western border of Tver’ City and this range limit has not distinctly shifted north-westward during 2015–2019. In spite of the rich food supply (due to abundant F. pennsylvanica and F. excelsior plantings) in Tver’ City and along roads going to and from, the population density of A. planipennis in the area is currently low. Recent (September 2020) sudden detection of a spatially isolated A. planipennis outbreak approx. 520 km far north-westward from Tver’ (in Saint Petersburg) suggested that A. planipennis most likely had arrived at Saint Petersburg not by gradual stepwise (flying tree-to-tree) expansion of its continuous invasive range in Tver’ City, but as a result of its accidental introduction by means of, e.g., “insect-hitchhiked” vehicles, transported plants for planting, and/or other commodities. The proximity of the reported A. planipennis outbreak to the borders of the EU (approx. 130 km to Estonia and Finland) requires urgent measures for its containment and control, and constant monitoring. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Scopus

Держатели документа:
Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game Management, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, Institutskiy Per. 5, Saint Petersburg, 194021, Russian Federation
Department of Biogeography and Environmental Protection, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Nab. 7–9, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
Department of Forest Zoology, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, Akademgorodok 50, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russian Federation
Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SE-750, Sweden

Доп.точки доступа:
Musolin, D. L.; Selikhovkin, A. V.; Peregudova, E. Y.; Popovichev, B. G.; Mandelshtam, M. Y.; Baranchikov, Y. N.; Vasaitis, R.