Труды сотрудников ИЛ им. В.Н. Сукачева СО РАН

/ N. Kirichenko, P. J. Haubrock, R. N. Cuthbert [et al.] // NeoBiota. - 2021. - Vol. 67. - P103-130, DOI 10.3897/neobiota.67.58529. - Cited References:73. - We thank Vera Yakovleva (VNIIKR, Bykovo, Moscow Oblast) for providing important comments on the manuscript, Vladimir Ponomarev, Vitaly Kulakov (both from VNIIKR, Bykovo, Moscow Oblast) and Denis Kasatkin (VNIIKR, Rostov Branch, Rostov-on-Don) for giving us the permission to use their photographs of pests and weeds, Anna Turbelin (France) for translating the abstract to French. We sincerely thank Johannes Peterseil and one anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments and suggestions that significantly improved our manuscript. We acknowledge the French National Research Agency (ANR-14-CE02-0021) and the BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the InvaCost project that allowed the construction of the InvaCost database. The present work was conducted following a workshop funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology and is part of the AlienScenario project funded by BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios. NK is partially funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 19-04-01029-A) [InvaCost database contribution], the basic project of Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS (project No. 0287-2021-0011) [national literature survey] and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (project No. FEFE-2020-0014) [data analysis]. RNC is funded by a research fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. CD is funded by the BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project "Alien Scenarios" (BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C). EAn contract comes from the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology of University Paris Saclay. . - ISSN 1619-0033. - ISSN 1314-2488РУБ Biodiversity Conservation + Ecology

Аннотация: Terrestrial ecosystems, owing to the presence of key socio-economic sectors such as agriculture and forestry, may be particularly economically affected by biological invasions. The present study uses a subset of the recently developed database of global economic costs of biological invasions (InvaCost) to quantify the monetary costs of biological invasions in Russia, the largest country in the world that spans two continents. From 2007 up to 2019, invasions costed the Russian economy at least US$ 51.52 billion (RUB 1.38 trillion, n = 94 cost entries), with the vast majority of these costs based on predictions or extrapolations (US$ 50.86 billion; n = 87) and, therefore, not empirically observed. Most cost entries exhibited low geographic resolution, being split between European and Asian parts of Russia (US$ 44.17 billion; n = 72). Just US$ 7.35 billion (n = 22) was attributed to the European part solely and none to the Asian part. Invasion costs were documented for 72 species and particularly insects (37 species). The empirically-observed costs, summing up to US$ 660 million (n = 7), were reported only for four species: two insects Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire and Cydalima perspectalis (Walker) and two plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. The vast majority of economic costs were related to resource damages and economic losses, with very little reported expenditures on managing invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. In turn, agriculture (US$ 37.42 billion; n = 68) and forestry (US$ 14.0 billion; n = 20) were the most impacted sectors. Overall, we report burgeoning economic costs of invasions in Russia and identify major knowledge gaps, for example, concerning specific habitat types (i.e. aquatic) and management expenditures, as well as for numerous known invasive taxa with no reported economic costs (i.e. vertebrates). Given this massive, largely underestimated economic burden of invasions in Russia, our work is a call for improved reporting of costs nationally and internationally.

WOS

Держатели документа:
Russian Acad Sci, Sukachev Inst Forest, Siberian Branch, Fed Res Ctr,Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Reshetnev Siberian State Univ Sci & Technol, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Senckenberg Res Inst, Gelnhausen, Germany.
Nat Hist Museum Frankfurt, Dept River Ecol & Conservat, Gelnhausen, Germany.
Univ South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice, Fac Fisheries & Protect Waters, South Bohemian Res Ctr Aquaculture & Biodivers Hy, Vodnany, Czech Republic.
GEOMAR Helmholtz Zentrum Ozeanforsch Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Biol Sci, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland.
All Russian Plant Quarantine Ctr, Krasnoyarsk Branch, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
All Russian Plant Quarantine Ctr, Ramenskoye, Moscow Oblast, Russia.
Free Univ Berlin, Inst Biol, Berlin, Germany.
Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisheries I, Berlin, Germany.
Berlin Brandenburg Inst Adv Biodivers Res BBIB, Berlin, Germany.
Univ Paris Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecol Systemat Evolut, Orsay, France.

Доп.точки доступа:
Kirichenko, Natalia; Haubrock, Phillip J.; Cuthbert, Ross N.; Akulov, Evgeny; Karimova, Elena; Shneider, Yuri; Liu, Chunlong; Angulo, Elena; Diagne, Christophe; Courchamp, Franck; French National Research AgencyFrench National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-14-CE02-0021]; BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative; AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology; BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios; Russian Foundation for Basic ResearchRussian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [19-04-01029-A]; Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS [0287-2021-0011]; Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationMinistry of Education and Science, Russian Federation [FEFE-2020-0014]; Alexander von Humboldt FoundationAlexander von Humboldt Foundation; BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project "Alien Scenarios" [BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C]