Труды сотрудников ИЛ им. В.Н. Сукачева СО РАН

w10=
Найдено документов в текущей БД: 2

    Reconstruction of the mid-Holocene palaeoclimate of Siberia using a bioclimatic vegetation model
[Text] / R. A. Monserud, N. M. Tchebakova, O. V. Denissenko // Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. - 1998. - Vol. 139, Is. 01.02.2013. - P15-36, DOI 10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00127-2. - Cited References: 72 . - 22. - ISSN 0031-0182
РУБ Geography, Physical + Geosciences, Multidisciplinary + Paleontology

Аннотация: A bioclimatic vegetation model is used to reconstruct the palaeoclimate of Siberia during the mid-Holocene, a warm. moist period also known as the Holocene climatic optimum. Our goal is to determine the magnitude of climatic anomalies associated with mapped changes in vegetation classes. Reconstructed anomalies are the logical outcome of the bioclimatic assumptions in the Siberia vegetation model operating on location-specific differences in the palaeomap of Khotinsky and the modern map of Isachenko. The Siberian vegetation model specifics the relationship between vegetation classes and climate using climatic indices (growing-degree days, dryness index, continentality index). These indices are then converted into parameters commonly used in climatic reconstructions: January and July mean temperatures. and annual precipitation. Climatic anomalies since the mid-Holocene are then displayed by latitude and longitude. An advantage of a model-based approach to climatic reconstruction is that grid cells can be modelled independently. without the need for interpolation to create smoothed temperature and precipitation contours. The resulting pattern of anomalies is complex. On average. Siberian winters in the mid-Holocene were 3.7 degrees C warmer than now, with greater warming in higher latitudes. The major winter warming was concentrated in the Taiga zone on the plains and tablelands of East Siberia, where a warm and moist climate was necessary to support a broad expanse of shade-tolerant dark-needled Taiga. January temperatures averaged about 1 degrees C warmer than now across southern Siberia. although large areas show no change. July temperature anomalies (0-5 degrees C) are distributed mostly latitudinally, with anomalies increasing with latitude above 65 degrees N. At latitudes below 65 degrees N, July temperature was nearly the same as today across Siberia. Based on July temperatures. Siberian summers in the mid-Holocene were 0.7 degrees C warmer than today's. Annual precipitation in Siberia was predicted to be 95 mm greater in the mid-Holocene than now. Most of the increase was concentrated in East Siberia (154 mm average increase). The precipitation anomalies are small in the south. Large precipitation anomalies are found in central and northeastern Siberia. This location corresponds rather closely to the large anomalies in January temperature in East Siberia. The annual precipitation Increase was > 200 mm more than present precipitation in Yakutia. This increase corresponds to the deep penetration of moisture-demanding dark-needled species (Pinus sibirica. Abies sibirica, Picea obovata) into East Siberia in the mid-Holocene, where currently only drought-resistant light-needled species (Larix spp.) are found. Another area of increased precipitation was along the Polar Circle in West Siberia and at the base of the Taymyr Peninsula in East Siberia. In combination with 2-5 degrees C warmer summers, moister climates there allowed forests to advance far northward into what is now the Tundra zone.

WOS,
Полный текст,
Scopus

Держатели документа:
Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, Portland, OR 97205 USA
Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, USDA, Portland, OR 97205 USA
Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Sukachev Forest Inst, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia
Moscow State Univ, Dept Geog, Moscow 119899, Russia

Доп.точки доступа:
Monserud, R.A.; Tchebakova, N.M.; Denissenko, O.V.

    Systematics and biology of some species of Micrurapteryx Spuler (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) from the Holarctic Region, with re-description of M-caraganella (Hering) from Siberia
[Text] / N. Kirichenko [et al.] // ZooKeys. - 2016. - Is. 579. - P99-156, DOI 10.3897/zookeys.579.7166. - Cited References:68. - We are grateful to the team at the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada for their great assistance in the production of DNA barcodes. Funding for DNA barcoding and sequence analysis was partly provided by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Ontario Genomics Institute in support of the International Barcode of Life project, and by NSERC. Genetic analyses were also partly funded by INRA, UR0633 Zoologie Forestiere's core funding. Our work was also aided by the BOLD informatics platform whose development is funded by the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation. NK was supported by a fellowship of LE STUDIUM (R), France and the Russian foundation for basic research (grant No 15-29-02645). . - ISSN 1313-2989. - ISSN 1313-2970
РУБ Zoology

Аннотация: During a DNA barcoding campaign of leaf-mining insects from Siberia, a genetically divergent lineage of a gracillariid belonging to the genus Micrurapteryx was discovered, whose larvae developed on Caragana Fabr. and Medicago L. (Fabaceae). Specimens from Siberia showed similar external morphology to the Palearctic Micrurapteryx gradatella and the Nearctic Parectopa occulta but differed in male genitalia, DNA barcodes, and nuclear genes histone H3 and 28S. Members of this lineage are re-described here as Micrurapteryx caraganella (Hering, 1957), comb. n., an available name published with only a brief description of its larva and leaf mine. Micrurapteryx caraganella is widely distributed throughout Siberia, from Tyumen oblast in the West to Transbaikalia in the East. Occasionally it may severely affect its main host, Caragana arborescens Lam. This species has been confused in the past with Micrurapreryx gradatella in Siberia, but field observations confirm that M. gradatella exists in Siberia and is sympatric with M. caraganella, at least in the Krasnoyarsk region, where it feeds on different host plants (Vicia amoena Fisch. and Vicia sp.). In addition, based on both morphological and molecular evidence as well as examination of type specimens, the North American Parectopa occulta Braun, 1922 and Parectopa albicostella Braun, 1925 are transferred to Micrurapteryx as M. occulta (Braun, 1922), comb. n. with albicostella as its junior synonym (syn. n.). Characters used to distinguish Micrurapteryx from Parectopa are presented and illustrated. These findings provide another example of the potential of DNA barcoding to reveal overlooked species and illuminate nomenclatural problems.

WOS,
Scopus

Держатели документа:
Sukachev Inst Forest SB RAS, Akademgorodok 50-28, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, 79 Svobodny Pr, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia.
INRA, Zool Forestiere UR0633, F-45075 Orleans, France.
Museo Civ Storia Nat, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, I-37129 Verona, Italy.
Univ Oulu, Dept Genet & Physiol, POB 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.
Agr & Agri Food Canada, Ottawa Res & Dev Ctr, Cent Expt Farm, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.
Univ Tours, Inst Rech Biol Insecte, CNRS UMR 7261, UFR Sci & Tech, F-37200 Tours, France.

Доп.точки доступа:
Kirichenko, Natalia; Triberti, Paolo; Mutanen, Marko; Magnoux, Emmanuelle; Landry, Jean-Francois; Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Government of Canada through Genome Canada; Ontario Genomics Institute; NSERC; INRA [UR0633]; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation; LE STUDIUM(R), France; Russian foundation for basic research [15-29-02645]