Библиотека института биофизики СО РАН

Главная

Базы данных

Труды сотрудников ИБФ СО РАН - результаты поиска

Вид поиска

Каталог книг и продолжающихся изданий библиотеки Института биофизики СО РАН

Иностранные журналы библиотеки Института биофизики СО РАН

Отечественные журналы библиотеки Института биофизики СО РАН

Каталог диссертаций ИБФ СО РАН

Труды сотрудников ИБФ СО РАН

Область поиска

Формат представления найденных документов:
полный	информационный	краткий

Отсортировать найденные документы по:
автору	заглавию	году издания	типу документа

Поисковый запрос: (<.>K=Heterocope<.>)

Общее количество найденных документов : 5
Показаны документы с 1 по 5

Limnetic zooplankton passing through a high-head dam and their fate in a river with high current velocity (Case of the Krasnoyarsk hydroelectric power station on the Yenisey river) / O. P. Dubovskaya, M. I. Gladyshev, O. N. Makhutova // Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii. - 2004. - Vol. 65, Is. 1. - С. 92-93 . - ISSN 0044-4596
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
Copepoda -- Heterocope
Аннотация: The vertical distribution of net zooplankton in head-water of Krasnoyarsk hydroelectric power station and its horizontal distribution in the tail-water were studied during two years in winter and summer seasons. In order to distinguish living and dead individuals the special staining was used. It was revealed that on average 77% of living plankton pass through high-head dam with deep water scoop to the tailwater. While passing through dam aggregates some individuals of the reservoir plankton are traumatized and die, that results in some increase of portion of dead individuals in the tail water near dam (from 3 to 6%). Alive zooplankton passed through the dam aggregates is eliminated under the Upper Yenisey highly turbulent conditions. There is approximately 10% of it in 32 km from the dam if compare with biomass in 20-40 m layer of reservoir, the portion of dead increases to 11%. The biomass of zooplankton suspended in the water column of the tail-water sometimes increases (till > 1 g/m3) due to large Copepoda Heterocope borealis, which inhabits near-bottom and near-shore river zones and can be found in the central part of the river during reproductive period. Limnetic zooplankton from the reservoir cannot be considered as important food for planktivores in the tail-water.

Scopus
Держатели документа:
Institute of Biophysics, Siberian Branch of RAS, Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk State University, Svobodny av., 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation : 660036, Красноярск, Академгородок, д. 50, стр. 50

Доп.точки доступа:
Dubovskaya, O.P.; Gladyshev, M.I.; Makhutova, O.N.

Найти похожие

^a341.35.33.57.47.37.33.31^2VINITI
Д 79

Дубовская, О. П.
Сток лимнического зоопланктона через высоконапорную плотину и его судьба в реке с быстрым течением (на примере плотины Красноярской ГЭС на р. Енисей) [Текст] : научное издание / О. П. Дубовская, М. И. Гладышев, О. Н. Махутова // Ж. общ. биол. - 2004. - Т. 65, N 1. - С. 81-93 . - ISSN 0044-4596

ГРНТИ

34.35.33

РУБ 341.35.33.57.47.37.33.31 + 341.35.33.57.37.37.33.31
Рубрики:
ЗООПЛАНКТОН
   ВОДОХРАНИЛИЩА
   ГИБЕЛЬ ПРИ ПРОХОЖДЕНИИ ЧЕРЕЗ ПЛОТИНУ
   СОСТОЯНИЕ В РЕКЕ
   КРАСНОЯРСКАЯ ГЭС
   Р. ЕНИСЕЙ
Аннотация: Двухлетние исследования сетного зоопланктона в верхнем и нижнем бьефах Красноярской ГЭС с учетом специальной дифференцировки на живых и мертвых показали, что через высоконапорную плотину с глубинным водозабором в нижний бьеф проходит в среднем 77% биомассы живого зоопланктона водохранилища с глубин водозаборных отверстий гидроагрегатов (20-40 м). При транзите через агрегаты плотины происходит травмирование и гибель некоторой части планктонных ракообразных: доля мертвых в общей биомассе зоопланктона возрастает в среднем в 2 раза (с 3 до 6%). Прошедший через агрегаты плотины живой зоопланктон не выживает в условиях Верхнего Енисея с высокой турбулентностью потока. В 32 км от плотины его остается в среднем около 10% ('ПРИБЛ='10 мг/м{3}) от биомассы в слое 20-40 м водохранилища; доля мертвых возрастает в среднем до 11%. Биомасса транзитного зоопланктона в нижнем бьефе иногда увеличивается (до конц-ии 1 г/м{3}) за счет крупного рачка Heterocope borealis, к-рый заселил придонно-прибрежные зоны реки и в периоды размножения выносится на стержень. Лимнический зоопланктон из водохранилища не может рассматриваться как кормовой объект планктофагов в нижнем бьефе. Россия, Ин-т биофизики СО РАН, 660036 Красноярск Академгородок, e-mail: labehe@ibp.ru. Библ. 15
: 660036, Красноярск, Академгородок, д. 50, стр. 50

Доп.точки доступа:
Гладышев, М.И.; Махутова, О.Н.

Найти похожие

Linmetic zooplankton passing through a high-head dam and their fate in a river with high current velocity (case of the Krasnoyarsk Hydroelectric Power Station on the Yenisey River) [Текст] / O. P. Dubovskaya, M. I. Gladyshev, O. N. Makhutova // Zhurnal Obshchei Biol. - 2004. - Vol. 65, Is. 1. - P. 81-93. - Cited References: 15 . - ISSN 0044-4596

РУБ Biology
Рубрики:
MORTALITY
Аннотация: The vertical distribution of net zooplankton in head-water of Krasnoyarsk hydroelectric power station and its horizontal distribution in the tail-water were studied during two years in winter and summer seasons. In order to distinguish living and dead individuals the special staining was used. It was revealed that on average 77% of living plankton pass through high-head dam with deep water scoop to the tailwater. While passing through dam aggregates some individuals of the reservoir plankton are traumatized and die, that results in some increase of portion of dead individuals in the tail water near dam (from 3 to 6%). Alive zooplankton passed through the darn aggregates is eliminated under the Upper Yenisey highly turbulent conditions. There is approximately 10% of it in 32 km from the dam if compare with biomass in 20-40 m layer of reservoir; the portion of dead increases to I M. The biomass of zooplankton suspended in the water column of the tail-water sometimes increases (till 1 g/m(3)) due to large Copepoda Heterocope borealis, which inhabits near-bottom and near-shore river zones and can be found in the central part of the river during reproductive period. Limnetic zooplankton from the reservoir cannot be considered as important food for planktivores in the tail-water.

WOS
Держатели документа:
RAS, Siberian Branch, Inst Biophys, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia
Krasnoyarsk State Univ, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia
ИБФ СО РАН : 660036, Красноярск, Академгородок, д. 50, стр. 50

Доп.точки доступа:
Dubovskaya, O.P.; Gladyshev, M.I.; Makhutova, O.N.

Найти похожие

Biogeographic patterns of planktonic and meiobenthic fauna diversity in inland waters of the Russian Arctic / E. Fefilova, O. Dubovskaya, L. Frolova [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2020, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13624 . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
cladocerans -- copepods -- rotifers -- spatial and temporal trends -- species richness
Аннотация: Broad-scale assessment of biodiversity is needed for detection of future changes across substantial regions of the Arctic. Presently, there are large data and information gaps in species composition and richness of the freshwater planktonic and meiobenthos communities of the Russian Arctic. Analysis of these data is very important for identifying the spatial distribution and temporal changes in species richness and diversity of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods in the continental Russian Arctic. We investigated biogeographic patterns of freshwater plankton and meiobenthos from c. 67° to 73°N by analysing data over the period 1960–2017. These data include information on the composition of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods obtained from planktonic and meiobenthic samples, as well as from subfossil remains in bottom sediments of seven regions from the Kola Peninsula in the west, to the Indigirka River Basin (east Siberia) in the east. Total richness included 175 species comprised of 49 rotifer genera, 81 species from 40 cladoceran genera, and 101 species from 42 genera of calanoid, cyclopoid, and harpacticoid copepods. Longitudinal trends in rotifer and micro-crustacean diversity were revealed by change in species composition from Europe to eastern Siberia. The most common and widespread species were 19 ubiquitous taxa that included Kellicottia longispina (Rotifera), Chydorus sphaericus s. lat. (Cladocera), Heterocope borealis, Acanthocyclops vernalis, and Moraria duthiei (Copepoda). The highest number of rare species was recorded in the well-studied region of the Bolshezemelskaya tundra and in the Putorana Plateau. The total number of copepod and rotifer species in both Arctic lakes and ponds tended to increase with latitude. Relative species richness of copepods was positively associated with waterbody area, elevation, and precipitation, while relative species richness of cladocerans was positively related to temperature. This result is consistent with known thermophilic characteristics of cladocerans and the cold tolerance properties of copepods, with the former being dominant in shallow, warmer waterbodies of some western regions, and the latter being dominant in large cold lakes and waterbodies of eastern regions. Rotifers showed a negative association with these factors. Alpha- and ?-diversity of zooplankton in the Russian Arctic were strongly related to waterbody type. Lake zooplankton communities were more diverse than those in pond and pool systems. Moreover, the highest ?-diversity values were observed in regions that showed a greater breadth in latitude and highly heterogeneous environmental conditions and waterbody types (Bolshezemelskaya tundra and Putorana Plateau). Redistribution of freshwater micro-fauna caused by human activities occurred in the 1990s and 2000s. As a result of climate warming, a few cladoceran species appear to have extended their range northward. Nevertheless, the rotifer and micro-crustacean fauna composition and diversity of the majority of Arctic regions generally remain temporally conservative, and spatial differences in composition and species richness are chiefly associated with the differences between the warmer European and colder east Siberian climates. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Scopus
Держатели документа:
Institute of Biology of Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russian Federation
Institute of Biophysics of Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center” of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation
Lena Delta Nature Reserve, Tiksi, Sakha Republic, Russian Federation
Finnish Natural History Museum LUOMUS University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Доп.точки доступа:
Fefilova, E.; Dubovskaya, O.; Frolova, L.; Abramova, E.; Kononova, O.; Nigamatzyanova, G.; Zuev, I.; Kochanova, E.

Найти похожие

Biogeographic patterns of planktonic and meiobenthic fauna diversity in inland waters of the Russian Arctic / E. Fefilova, O. Dubovskaya, L. Frolova [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2020, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13624. - Cited References:63. - We would like to thank A. Kotov, N. Korovchinsky, A. Sinev, E. Bekker, N. Smirnov (all from Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of RAS) for their assistance in Cladocera identification. We are very grateful to Jennifer Lento (University of New Brunswick, Canada) for helping us obtain elevation, temperature, and precipitation data from World Climate and ArcticDEM (NGA-NSF). We are also grateful to Willem Goedkoop for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The study was performed in part as Federal Tasks of Department of Animals Ecology of the Institute of Biology of Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (AAAA-A17-117112850235-2), and also of Institute of Biophysics of Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (project No. 51.1.1) and the Siberian Federal University (project No. FSRZ-2020-0006). Monitoring investigations in the Lena River Delta were conducted under the framework of Russian-German, "Lena" expeditions (Alfred Wegener Institute, Potsdam, Germany) with logistic and technical support of Scientific Research Station "Samoylov Island" (Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum-Gas, Geology and Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk). We are grateful to three anonymous reviewers, Guest Editor, Dr Joseph Culp, and the Chief Editor, Prof. Belinda Robson for their useful comments to improve the manuscript. . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070. - ISSN 1365-2427

РУБ Ecology + Marine & Freshwater Biology
Рубрики:
GLOBAL DIVERSITY
   CRUSTACEAN ZOOPLANKTON
   CLADOCERA
   ANOMOPODA
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
cladocerans -- copepods -- rotifers -- spatial and temporal trends -- species -- richness
Аннотация: Broad-scale assessment of biodiversity is needed for detection of future changes across substantial regions of the Arctic. Presently, there are large data and information gaps in species composition and richness of the freshwater planktonic and meiobenthos communities of the Russian Arctic. Analysis of these data is very important for identifying the spatial distribution and temporal changes in species richness and diversity of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods in the continental Russian Arctic. We investigated biogeographic patterns of freshwater plankton and meiobenthos fromc. 67 degrees to 73 degrees N by analysing data over the period 1960-2017. These data include information on the composition of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods obtained from planktonic and meiobenthic samples, as well as from subfossil remains in bottom sediments of seven regions from the Kola Peninsula in the west, to the Indigirka River Basin (east Siberia) in the east. Total richness included 175 species comprised of 49 rotifer genera, 81 species from 40 cladoceran genera, and 101 species from 42 genera of calanoid, cyclopoid, and harpacticoid copepods. Longitudinal trends in rotifer and micro-crustacean diversity were revealed by change in species composition from Europe to eastern Siberia. The most common and widespread species were 19 ubiquitous taxa that includedKellicottia longispina(Rotifera),Chydorus sphaericuss. lat. (Cladocera),Heterocope borealis,Acanthocyclops vernalis, andMoraria duthiei(Copepoda). The highest number of rare species was recorded in the well-studied region of the Bolshezemelskaya tundra and in the Putorana Plateau. The total number of copepod and rotifer species in both Arctic lakes and ponds tended to increase with latitude. Relative species richness of copepods was positively associated with waterbody area, elevation, and precipitation, while relative species richness of cladocerans was positively related to temperature. This result is consistent with known thermophilic characteristics of cladocerans and the cold tolerance properties of copepods, with the former being dominant in shallow, warmer waterbodies of some western regions, and the latter being dominant in large cold lakes and waterbodies of eastern regions. Rotifers showed a negative association with these factors. Alpha- and beta-diversity of zooplankton in the Russian Arctic were strongly related to waterbody type. Lake zooplankton communities were more diverse than those in pond and pool systems. Moreover, the highest beta-diversity values were observed in regions that showed a greater breadth in latitude and highly heterogeneous environmental conditions and waterbody types (Bolshezemelskaya tundra and Putorana Plateau). Redistribution of freshwater micro-fauna caused by human activities occurred in the 1990s and 2000s. As a result of climate warming, a few cladoceran species appear to have extended their range northward. Nevertheless, the rotifer and micro-crustacean fauna composition and diversity of the majority of Arctic regions generally remain temporally conservative, and spatial differences in composition and species richness are chiefly associated with the differences between the warmer European and colder east Siberian climates.

WOS
Держатели документа:
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Komi Sci Ctr, Ural Branch, Kommunisticheskaya 28, Syktyvkar 167982, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biophys, Fed Res Ctr, Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr,Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Kazan Fed Univ, Inst Geol & Petr Technol, Kazan, Russia.
Lena Delta Nat Reserve, Tiksi, Sakha Republic, Russia.
Univ Helsinki, Finnish Nat Hist Museum LUOMUS, Helsinki, Finland.

Доп.точки доступа:
Fefilova, Elena; Dubovskaya, Olga; Frolova, Larisa; Abramova, Ekaterina; Kononova, Olga; Nigamatzyanova, Gulnara; Zuev, Ivan; Kochanova, Elena; Federal Tasks of Department of Animals Ecology of the Institute of Biology of Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences [AAAA-A17-117112850235-2]; Institute of Biophysics of Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences [51.1.1]; Siberian Federal University [FSRZ-2020-0006]

Найти похожие

Тематический навигатор

Другие библиотеки

Библиотека института физики

Центральная научная библиотека КНЦ СО РАН

Библиотека института химии и химический технологии

Библиотека института вычислительного моделирования

Библиотека института леса

Библиотека СФУ

Краевая научная библиотека

© Международная Ассоциация пользователей и разработчиков электронных библиотек и новых информационных технологий
(Ассоциация ЭБНИТ)