Главная
Авторизация
Фамилия
Пароль
 

Базы данных


Труды сотрудников ИБФ СО РАН - результаты поиска

Вид поиска

Область поиска
Формат представления найденных документов:
полныйинформационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Поисковый запрос: (<.>K=ecoregions<.>)
Общее количество найденных документов : 3
Показаны документы с 1 по 3
1.


   
    Waterbugs (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha and Gerromorpha) as sources of essential n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in Central Siberian ecoregions [Text] / N. N. Sushchik [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2016. - Vol. 61, Is. 10. - P1787-1801, DOI 10.1111/fwb.12818. - Cited References:77. - The work was supported by award no. 13-04-00860 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and by the Russian Federal Tasks of Fundamental Research (projects no. 51.1.1 and VI.51.1.9). The research was partially supported by grant NSh-9249.2016.5 from the President of the Russian Federation. . - ISSN 0046-5070. - ISSN 1365-2427
РУБ Marine & Freshwater Biology
Рубрики:
FRESH-WATER
   TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS

   BUGS HETEROPTERA

   AQUATIC INSECTS

Кл.слова (ненормированные):
essential fatty acids -- Heteroptera -- subsidies -- terrestrial consumers -- waterbugs -- water-land transfers
Аннотация: 1. Aquatic systems are considered to be a main source of essential long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), which are preferentially synthesized by microalgae and transferred along food chains to terrestrial consumers. Emerging aquatic insects comprise a significant part of this transfer of the essential PUFA from water to land. Quantitative data on PUFA content and composition are available mainly for rheophilic insects while taxa that are characteristic of wetlands and stagnant water bodies, such as aquatic Heteroptera, remain relatively unstudied. 2. We investigated the role of various waterbug taxa (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha and Gerromorpha) inhabiting different ecoregions in temperate Central Siberia (Russia) as potential sources of PUFA. The ecoregions were steppe, forest-steppe, hemiboreal forest and montane coniferous forest. Although these waterbugs insects are aquatic in both larval and adult stages, they can disperse through the landscape and transfer essential PUFAs from water to land so making them potentially available to terrestrial consumers. 3. Species of Naucoridae, Notonectidae and Corixidae were generally dominant in all ecoregions, attaining maximum biomass in the steppe. We showed that habitat or ecoregion played a major role in the variability of fatty acid composition of Notonectidae and Gerridae but not Corixidae. In contrast, the biochemical composition of the only naucoridae, Ilyocoris cimicoides, was largely affected by life stage. 4. Both the dominant families and species within them differed with respect to their mass-specific contents of essential long-chain PUFA of the n-3 family, namely eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids. Corixid species had the highest content of these two essential PUFAs among the waterbug studies, and relative to literature reports for other aquatic insects. Corixids thus appear to be a potentially important vector for transfer of the essential biochemical compounds from water to land, especially in steppe ecoregions with numerous ephemeral water bodies.

WOS,
Смотреть статью
Держатели документа:
Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Inst Biophys, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Inst Systemat & Ecol Anim, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Tomsk State Univ, Inst Biol Ecol Soil Agr & Forest Sci, Tomsk, Russia.

Доп.точки доступа:
Sushchik, Nadezhda N.; Yurchenko, Yuri A.; Belevich, Olga E.; Kalachova, Galina S.; Kolmakova, Anzhelika A.; Gladyshev, Michail I.; Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-04-00860]; Russian Federal Tasks of Fundamental Research [51.1.1, VI.51.1.9]; Russian Federation [NSh-9249.2016.5]

Найти похожие
2.


   
    First circumpolar assessment of Arctic freshwater phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity: Spatial patterns and environmental factors / A. K. Schartau, H. L. Mariash, K. S. Christoffersen [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2021, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13783 . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
ecoregions -- latitude -- taxonomic richness -- temperature -- ? diversity -- ? diversity
Аннотация: Arctic freshwaters are facing multiple environmental pressures, including rapid climate change and increasing land-use activities. Freshwater plankton assemblages are expected to reflect the effects of these stressors through shifts in species distributions and changes to biodiversity. These changes may occur rapidly due to the short generation times and high dispersal capabilities of both phyto- and zooplankton. Spatial patterns and contemporary trends in plankton diversity throughout the circumpolar region were assessed using data from more than 300 lakes in the U.S.A. (Alaska), Canada, Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Russia. The main objectives of this study were: (1) to assess spatial patterns of plankton diversity focusing on pelagic communities; (2) to assess dominant component of ? diversity (turnover or nestedness); (3) to identify which environmental factors best explain diversity; and (4) to provide recommendations for future monitoring and assessment of freshwater plankton communities across the Arctic region. Phytoplankton and crustacean zooplankton diversity varied substantially across the Arctic and was positively related to summer air temperature. However, for zooplankton, the positive correlation between summer temperature and species numbers decreased with increasing latitude. Taxonomic richness was lower in the high Arctic compared to the sub- and low Arctic for zooplankton but this pattern was less clear for phytoplankton. Fennoscandia and inland regions of Russia represented hotspots for, respectively, phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity, whereas isolated regions had lower taxonomic richness. Ecoregions with high ? diversity generally also had high ? diversity, and turnover was the most important component of ? diversity in all ecoregions. For both phytoplankton and zooplankton, climatic variables were the most important environmental factors influencing diversity patterns, consistent with previous studies that examined shorter temperature gradients. However, barriers to dispersal may have also played a role in limiting diversity on islands. A better understanding of how diversity patterns are determined by colonisation history, environmental variables, and biotic interactions requires more monitoring data with locations dispersed evenly across the circumpolar Arctic. Furthermore, the importance of turnover in regional diversity patterns indicates that more extensive sampling is required to fully characterise the species pool of Arctic lakes. © 2021 The Authors. Freshwater Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Scopus
Держатели документа:
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Oslo, Norway
Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Freshwater Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen O, Denmark
Alaska Center for Conservation Science, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States
Institute of Biophysics, Krasnoyarsk Science Center, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Institute of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Centre, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russian Federation
Canadian Rivers Institute and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
Natural History Museum of Kopavogur, Kopavogur, Iceland
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway
Department of General Ecology and Hydrobiology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation
State Nature Reserve Wrangel Island, Pevek, Chukotka Autonomous Region, Russian Federation
Departement des sciences fondamentales, Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC, Canada
Centre for Northern Studies (CEN), Universite Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Paleoecological Environmental Assessment and Research Laboratory (PEARL), Department of Biology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Lammi Biological Station, University of Helsinki, Lammi, Finland

Доп.точки доступа:
Schartau, A. K.; Mariash, H. L.; Christoffersen, K. S.; Bogan, D.; Dubovskaya, O. P.; Fefilova, E. B.; Hayden, B.; Ingvason, H. R.; Ivanova, E. A.; Kononova, O. N.; Kravchuk, E. S.; Lento, J.; Majaneva, M.; Novichkova, A. A.; Rautio, M.; Ruhland, K. M.; Shaftel, R.; Smol, J. P.; Vrede, T.; Kahilainen, K. K.

Найти похожие
3.


   
    First circumpolar assessment of Arctic freshwater phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity: Spatial patterns and environmental factors / A. K. Schartau, H. L. Mariash, K. S. Christoffersen [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2021, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13783. - Cited References:78. - RFBR, Grant/Award Number: 20-04-00145_a . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070. - ISSN 1365-2427
РУБ Ecology + Marine & Freshwater Biology
Рубрики:
HIGH-LATITUDE LAKES
   CLIMATE-CHANGE

   SPECIES RICHNESS

   BETA DIVERSITY

Кл.слова (ненормированные):
alpha diversity -- beta diversity -- ecoregions -- latitude -- taxonomic -- richness -- temperature
Аннотация: Arctic freshwaters are facing multiple environmental pressures, including rapid climate change and increasing land-use activities. Freshwater plankton assemblages are expected to reflect the effects of these stressors through shifts in species distributions and changes to biodiversity. These changes may occur rapidly due to the short generation times and high dispersal capabilities of both phyto- and zooplankton. Spatial patterns and contemporary trends in plankton diversity throughout the circumpolar region were assessed using data from more than 300 lakes in the U.S.A. (Alaska), Canada, Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Russia. The main objectives of this study were: (1) to assess spatial patterns of plankton diversity focusing on pelagic communities; (2) to assess dominant component of beta diversity (turnover or nestedness); (3) to identify which environmental factors best explain diversity; and (4) to provide recommendations for future monitoring and assessment of freshwater plankton communities across the Arctic region. Phytoplankton and crustacean zooplankton diversity varied substantially across the Arctic and was positively related to summer air temperature. However, for zooplankton, the positive correlation between summer temperature and species numbers decreased with increasing latitude. Taxonomic richness was lower in the high Arctic compared to the sub- and low Arctic for zooplankton but this pattern was less clear for phytoplankton. Fennoscandia and inland regions of Russia represented hotspots for, respectively, phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity, whereas isolated regions had lower taxonomic richness. Ecoregions with high alpha diversity generally also had high beta diversity, and turnover was the most important component of beta diversity in all ecoregions. For both phytoplankton and zooplankton, climatic variables were the most important environmental factors influencing diversity patterns, consistent with previous studies that examined shorter temperature gradients. However, barriers to dispersal may have also played a role in limiting diversity on islands. A better understanding of how diversity patterns are determined by colonisation history, environmental variables, and biotic interactions requires more monitoring data with locations dispersed evenly across the circumpolar Arctic. Furthermore, the importance of turnover in regional diversity patterns indicates that more extensive sampling is required to fully characterise the species pool of Arctic lakes.

WOS
Держатели документа:
Norwegian Inst Nat Res, Songsveien 68, NO-0855 Oslo, Norway.
Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Environm & Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Univ Copenhagen, Freshwater Biol Sect, Dept Biol, Copenhagen O, Denmark.
Univ Alaska Anchorage, Alaska Ctr Conservat Sci, Anchorage, AK USA.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biophys, Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr, Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Inst Fundamental Biol & Biotechnol, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Komi Sci Ctr, Ural Branch, Syktyvkar, Russia.
Univ New Brunswick, Canadian Rivers Inst, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Univ New Brunswick, Dept Biol, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Nat Hist Museum Kopavogur, Kopavogur, Iceland.
Norwegian Inst Nat Res, Trondheim, Norway.
Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fac Biol, Dept Gen Ecol & Hydrobiol, Moscow, Russia.
State Nat Reserve Wrangel Isl, Pevek, Chukotka Autono, Russia.
Univ Quebec Chicoutimi, Dept Sci Fondamentales, Saguenay, PQ, Canada.
Univ Laval, Ctr Northern Studies CEN, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Paleoecol Environm Assessment & Res Lab PEARL, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Uppsala, Sweden.
Univ Helsinki, Lammi Biol Stn, Lammi, Finland.

Доп.точки доступа:
Schartau, Ann Kristin; Mariash, Heather L.; Christoffersen, Kirsten S.; Bogan, Daniel; Dubovskaya, Olga P.; Fefilova, Elena B.; Hayden, Brian; Ingvason, Haraldur R.; Ivanova, Elena A.; Kononova, Olga N.; Kravchuk, Elena S.; Lento, Jennifer; Majaneva, Markus; Novichkova, Anna A.; Rautio, Milla; Ruhland, Kathleen M.; Shaftel, Rebecca; Smol, John P.; Vrede, Tobias; Kahilainen, Kimmo K.; RFBRRussian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [20-04-00145_a]

Найти похожие
 

Другие библиотеки

© Международная Ассоциация пользователей и разработчиков электронных библиотек и новых информационных технологий
(Ассоциация ЭБНИТ)