Главная
Авторизация
Фамилия
Пароль
 

Базы данных


Труды сотрудников ИБФ СО РАН - результаты поиска

Вид поиска
Каталог книг и продолжающихся изданий библиотеки Института биофизики СО РАН
Иностранные журналы библиотеки Института биофизики СО РАН
Отечественные журналы библиотеки Института биофизики СО РАН
Каталог диссертаций ИБФ СО РАН
Труды сотрудников ИБФ СО РАН
Область поиска
Формат представления найденных документов:
полныйинформационныйкраткий
Отсортировать найденные документы по:
авторузаглавиюгоду изданиятипу документа
Поисковый запрос: (<.>K=latitude<.>)
Общее количество найденных документов : 5
Показаны документы с 1 по 5
1.


   
    A closed ecological system as a means of providing high quality of life in an antarctic station and as a model of a life-support system for the martian mission / J. I. Gitelson [et al.] // International Astronautical Federation - 55th International Astronautical Congress 2004. - 2004. - Vol. 3: International Astronautical Federation - 55th International Astronautical Congress 2004 (4 October 2004 through 8 October 2004, Vancouver) Conference code: 69653. - P1428-1435
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
Biotechnology -- Environmental impact -- Martian surface analysis -- Photosynthesis -- Psychophysiology -- Water pollution -- Antarctic station -- Closing technology -- Ecological life support system -- Environmental pollution -- Ecosystems
Аннотация: This closing technology developed for experimental BIOS-3 facility seems to be highly expedient for providing normal life conditions in high-latitude settlements and first of all for life-support of Antarctic stations. Obvious advantages of ecological life-support system based on photosynthesis, in comparison with used now in Antarctic Continent, are: 1) highly effective cascade usage of energy for performance of all functions of life-support; 2) minimization of environmental pollution due to processing human excretions and polluted water; 3) providing crew with fresh vegetable food all-the-year-round; 4) contact with alive plants is powerful source of positive emotions and effective means of psychological relaxation; 5) significant reduction of the transport charges on delivery of foodstuff to Antarctic Continent. First of all, the usage of closed ecosystem can be recommended for high-mountainous station "Concordia". Similar ecosystems can be used in northern high-latitude settlements - Russian North, Canadian Northern territories, Alaska. Finally, the experience of closed ecological life-support system operation in Antarctic Continent can serve as the best range for modeling some aspects of Martian mission - its ecological, biotechnological and psychophysiological problems - since there are no natural conditions on the Earth closer to Mars with respect to severity of a place.

Scopus
Держатели документа:
Institute of Biophysics, SB, RAS, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russian Federation : 660036, Красноярск, Академгородок, д. 50, стр. 50

Доп.точки доступа:
Gitelson, J.I.; Bartsev, S.I.; Okhonin, V.A.; Mezhevikin, V.V.

Найти похожие
2.


   
    Biogeographic patterns of planktonic and meiobenthic fauna diversity in inland waters of the Russian Arctic / E. Fefilova, O. Dubovskaya, L. Frolova [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2020, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13624 . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
cladocerans -- copepods -- rotifers -- spatial and temporal trends -- species richness
Аннотация: Broad-scale assessment of biodiversity is needed for detection of future changes across substantial regions of the Arctic. Presently, there are large data and information gaps in species composition and richness of the freshwater planktonic and meiobenthos communities of the Russian Arctic. Analysis of these data is very important for identifying the spatial distribution and temporal changes in species richness and diversity of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods in the continental Russian Arctic. We investigated biogeographic patterns of freshwater plankton and meiobenthos from c. 67° to 73°N by analysing data over the period 1960–2017. These data include information on the composition of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods obtained from planktonic and meiobenthic samples, as well as from subfossil remains in bottom sediments of seven regions from the Kola Peninsula in the west, to the Indigirka River Basin (east Siberia) in the east. Total richness included 175 species comprised of 49 rotifer genera, 81 species from 40 cladoceran genera, and 101 species from 42 genera of calanoid, cyclopoid, and harpacticoid copepods. Longitudinal trends in rotifer and micro-crustacean diversity were revealed by change in species composition from Europe to eastern Siberia. The most common and widespread species were 19 ubiquitous taxa that included Kellicottia longispina (Rotifera), Chydorus sphaericus s. lat. (Cladocera), Heterocope borealis, Acanthocyclops vernalis, and Moraria duthiei (Copepoda). The highest number of rare species was recorded in the well-studied region of the Bolshezemelskaya tundra and in the Putorana Plateau. The total number of copepod and rotifer species in both Arctic lakes and ponds tended to increase with latitude. Relative species richness of copepods was positively associated with waterbody area, elevation, and precipitation, while relative species richness of cladocerans was positively related to temperature. This result is consistent with known thermophilic characteristics of cladocerans and the cold tolerance properties of copepods, with the former being dominant in shallow, warmer waterbodies of some western regions, and the latter being dominant in large cold lakes and waterbodies of eastern regions. Rotifers showed a negative association with these factors. Alpha- and ?-diversity of zooplankton in the Russian Arctic were strongly related to waterbody type. Lake zooplankton communities were more diverse than those in pond and pool systems. Moreover, the highest ?-diversity values were observed in regions that showed a greater breadth in latitude and highly heterogeneous environmental conditions and waterbody types (Bolshezemelskaya tundra and Putorana Plateau). Redistribution of freshwater micro-fauna caused by human activities occurred in the 1990s and 2000s. As a result of climate warming, a few cladoceran species appear to have extended their range northward. Nevertheless, the rotifer and micro-crustacean fauna composition and diversity of the majority of Arctic regions generally remain temporally conservative, and spatial differences in composition and species richness are chiefly associated with the differences between the warmer European and colder east Siberian climates. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Scopus
Держатели документа:
Institute of Biology of Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russian Federation
Institute of Biophysics of Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center” of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation
Lena Delta Nature Reserve, Tiksi, Sakha Republic, Russian Federation
Finnish Natural History Museum LUOMUS University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Доп.точки доступа:
Fefilova, E.; Dubovskaya, O.; Frolova, L.; Abramova, E.; Kononova, O.; Nigamatzyanova, G.; Zuev, I.; Kochanova, E.

Найти похожие
3.


   
    Biogeographic patterns of planktonic and meiobenthic fauna diversity in inland waters of the Russian Arctic / E. Fefilova, O. Dubovskaya, L. Frolova [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2020, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13624. - Cited References:63. - We would like to thank A. Kotov, N. Korovchinsky, A. Sinev, E. Bekker, N. Smirnov (all from Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of RAS) for their assistance in Cladocera identification. We are very grateful to Jennifer Lento (University of New Brunswick, Canada) for helping us obtain elevation, temperature, and precipitation data from World Climate and ArcticDEM (NGA-NSF). We are also grateful to Willem Goedkoop for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The study was performed in part as Federal Tasks of Department of Animals Ecology of the Institute of Biology of Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (AAAA-A17-117112850235-2), and also of Institute of Biophysics of Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (project No. 51.1.1) and the Siberian Federal University (project No. FSRZ-2020-0006). Monitoring investigations in the Lena River Delta were conducted under the framework of Russian-German, "Lena" expeditions (Alfred Wegener Institute, Potsdam, Germany) with logistic and technical support of Scientific Research Station "Samoylov Island" (Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum-Gas, Geology and Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk). We are grateful to three anonymous reviewers, Guest Editor, Dr Joseph Culp, and the Chief Editor, Prof. Belinda Robson for their useful comments to improve the manuscript. . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070. - ISSN 1365-2427
РУБ Ecology + Marine & Freshwater Biology
Рубрики:
GLOBAL DIVERSITY
   CRUSTACEAN ZOOPLANKTON
   CLADOCERA
   ANOMOPODA
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
cladocerans -- copepods -- rotifers -- spatial and temporal trends -- species -- richness
Аннотация: Broad-scale assessment of biodiversity is needed for detection of future changes across substantial regions of the Arctic. Presently, there are large data and information gaps in species composition and richness of the freshwater planktonic and meiobenthos communities of the Russian Arctic. Analysis of these data is very important for identifying the spatial distribution and temporal changes in species richness and diversity of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods in the continental Russian Arctic. We investigated biogeographic patterns of freshwater plankton and meiobenthos fromc. 67 degrees to 73 degrees N by analysing data over the period 1960-2017. These data include information on the composition of rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods obtained from planktonic and meiobenthic samples, as well as from subfossil remains in bottom sediments of seven regions from the Kola Peninsula in the west, to the Indigirka River Basin (east Siberia) in the east. Total richness included 175 species comprised of 49 rotifer genera, 81 species from 40 cladoceran genera, and 101 species from 42 genera of calanoid, cyclopoid, and harpacticoid copepods. Longitudinal trends in rotifer and micro-crustacean diversity were revealed by change in species composition from Europe to eastern Siberia. The most common and widespread species were 19 ubiquitous taxa that includedKellicottia longispina(Rotifera),Chydorus sphaericuss. lat. (Cladocera),Heterocope borealis,Acanthocyclops vernalis, andMoraria duthiei(Copepoda). The highest number of rare species was recorded in the well-studied region of the Bolshezemelskaya tundra and in the Putorana Plateau. The total number of copepod and rotifer species in both Arctic lakes and ponds tended to increase with latitude. Relative species richness of copepods was positively associated with waterbody area, elevation, and precipitation, while relative species richness of cladocerans was positively related to temperature. This result is consistent with known thermophilic characteristics of cladocerans and the cold tolerance properties of copepods, with the former being dominant in shallow, warmer waterbodies of some western regions, and the latter being dominant in large cold lakes and waterbodies of eastern regions. Rotifers showed a negative association with these factors. Alpha- and beta-diversity of zooplankton in the Russian Arctic were strongly related to waterbody type. Lake zooplankton communities were more diverse than those in pond and pool systems. Moreover, the highest beta-diversity values were observed in regions that showed a greater breadth in latitude and highly heterogeneous environmental conditions and waterbody types (Bolshezemelskaya tundra and Putorana Plateau). Redistribution of freshwater micro-fauna caused by human activities occurred in the 1990s and 2000s. As a result of climate warming, a few cladoceran species appear to have extended their range northward. Nevertheless, the rotifer and micro-crustacean fauna composition and diversity of the majority of Arctic regions generally remain temporally conservative, and spatial differences in composition and species richness are chiefly associated with the differences between the warmer European and colder east Siberian climates.

WOS
Держатели документа:
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Komi Sci Ctr, Ural Branch, Kommunisticheskaya 28, Syktyvkar 167982, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biophys, Fed Res Ctr, Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr,Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Kazan Fed Univ, Inst Geol & Petr Technol, Kazan, Russia.
Lena Delta Nat Reserve, Tiksi, Sakha Republic, Russia.
Univ Helsinki, Finnish Nat Hist Museum LUOMUS, Helsinki, Finland.

Доп.точки доступа:
Fefilova, Elena; Dubovskaya, Olga; Frolova, Larisa; Abramova, Ekaterina; Kononova, Olga; Nigamatzyanova, Gulnara; Zuev, Ivan; Kochanova, Elena; Federal Tasks of Department of Animals Ecology of the Institute of Biology of Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences [AAAA-A17-117112850235-2]; Institute of Biophysics of Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences [51.1.1]; Siberian Federal University [FSRZ-2020-0006]

Найти похожие
4.


   
    First circumpolar assessment of Arctic freshwater phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity: Spatial patterns and environmental factors / A. K. Schartau, H. L. Mariash, K. S. Christoffersen [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2021, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13783 . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
ecoregions -- latitude -- taxonomic richness -- temperature -- ? diversity -- ? diversity
Аннотация: Arctic freshwaters are facing multiple environmental pressures, including rapid climate change and increasing land-use activities. Freshwater plankton assemblages are expected to reflect the effects of these stressors through shifts in species distributions and changes to biodiversity. These changes may occur rapidly due to the short generation times and high dispersal capabilities of both phyto- and zooplankton. Spatial patterns and contemporary trends in plankton diversity throughout the circumpolar region were assessed using data from more than 300 lakes in the U.S.A. (Alaska), Canada, Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Russia. The main objectives of this study were: (1) to assess spatial patterns of plankton diversity focusing on pelagic communities; (2) to assess dominant component of ? diversity (turnover or nestedness); (3) to identify which environmental factors best explain diversity; and (4) to provide recommendations for future monitoring and assessment of freshwater plankton communities across the Arctic region. Phytoplankton and crustacean zooplankton diversity varied substantially across the Arctic and was positively related to summer air temperature. However, for zooplankton, the positive correlation between summer temperature and species numbers decreased with increasing latitude. Taxonomic richness was lower in the high Arctic compared to the sub- and low Arctic for zooplankton but this pattern was less clear for phytoplankton. Fennoscandia and inland regions of Russia represented hotspots for, respectively, phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity, whereas isolated regions had lower taxonomic richness. Ecoregions with high ? diversity generally also had high ? diversity, and turnover was the most important component of ? diversity in all ecoregions. For both phytoplankton and zooplankton, climatic variables were the most important environmental factors influencing diversity patterns, consistent with previous studies that examined shorter temperature gradients. However, barriers to dispersal may have also played a role in limiting diversity on islands. A better understanding of how diversity patterns are determined by colonisation history, environmental variables, and biotic interactions requires more monitoring data with locations dispersed evenly across the circumpolar Arctic. Furthermore, the importance of turnover in regional diversity patterns indicates that more extensive sampling is required to fully characterise the species pool of Arctic lakes. © 2021 The Authors. Freshwater Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Scopus
Держатели документа:
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Oslo, Norway
Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Freshwater Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen O, Denmark
Alaska Center for Conservation Science, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States
Institute of Biophysics, Krasnoyarsk Science Center, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Institute of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Centre, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russian Federation
Canadian Rivers Institute and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
Natural History Museum of Kopavogur, Kopavogur, Iceland
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway
Department of General Ecology and Hydrobiology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation
State Nature Reserve Wrangel Island, Pevek, Chukotka Autonomous Region, Russian Federation
Departement des sciences fondamentales, Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi, Saguenay, QC, Canada
Centre for Northern Studies (CEN), Universite Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Paleoecological Environmental Assessment and Research Laboratory (PEARL), Department of Biology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Lammi Biological Station, University of Helsinki, Lammi, Finland

Доп.точки доступа:
Schartau, A. K.; Mariash, H. L.; Christoffersen, K. S.; Bogan, D.; Dubovskaya, O. P.; Fefilova, E. B.; Hayden, B.; Ingvason, H. R.; Ivanova, E. A.; Kononova, O. N.; Kravchuk, E. S.; Lento, J.; Majaneva, M.; Novichkova, A. A.; Rautio, M.; Ruhland, K. M.; Shaftel, R.; Smol, J. P.; Vrede, T.; Kahilainen, K. K.

Найти похожие
5.


   
    First circumpolar assessment of Arctic freshwater phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity: Spatial patterns and environmental factors / A. K. Schartau, H. L. Mariash, K. S. Christoffersen [et al.] // Freshw. Biol. - 2021, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13783. - Cited References:78. - RFBR, Grant/Award Number: 20-04-00145_a . - Article in press. - ISSN 0046-5070. - ISSN 1365-2427
РУБ Ecology + Marine & Freshwater Biology
Рубрики:
HIGH-LATITUDE LAKES
   CLIMATE-CHANGE
   SPECIES RICHNESS
   BETA DIVERSITY
Кл.слова (ненормированные):
alpha diversity -- beta diversity -- ecoregions -- latitude -- taxonomic -- richness -- temperature
Аннотация: Arctic freshwaters are facing multiple environmental pressures, including rapid climate change and increasing land-use activities. Freshwater plankton assemblages are expected to reflect the effects of these stressors through shifts in species distributions and changes to biodiversity. These changes may occur rapidly due to the short generation times and high dispersal capabilities of both phyto- and zooplankton. Spatial patterns and contemporary trends in plankton diversity throughout the circumpolar region were assessed using data from more than 300 lakes in the U.S.A. (Alaska), Canada, Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Russia. The main objectives of this study were: (1) to assess spatial patterns of plankton diversity focusing on pelagic communities; (2) to assess dominant component of beta diversity (turnover or nestedness); (3) to identify which environmental factors best explain diversity; and (4) to provide recommendations for future monitoring and assessment of freshwater plankton communities across the Arctic region. Phytoplankton and crustacean zooplankton diversity varied substantially across the Arctic and was positively related to summer air temperature. However, for zooplankton, the positive correlation between summer temperature and species numbers decreased with increasing latitude. Taxonomic richness was lower in the high Arctic compared to the sub- and low Arctic for zooplankton but this pattern was less clear for phytoplankton. Fennoscandia and inland regions of Russia represented hotspots for, respectively, phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity, whereas isolated regions had lower taxonomic richness. Ecoregions with high alpha diversity generally also had high beta diversity, and turnover was the most important component of beta diversity in all ecoregions. For both phytoplankton and zooplankton, climatic variables were the most important environmental factors influencing diversity patterns, consistent with previous studies that examined shorter temperature gradients. However, barriers to dispersal may have also played a role in limiting diversity on islands. A better understanding of how diversity patterns are determined by colonisation history, environmental variables, and biotic interactions requires more monitoring data with locations dispersed evenly across the circumpolar Arctic. Furthermore, the importance of turnover in regional diversity patterns indicates that more extensive sampling is required to fully characterise the species pool of Arctic lakes.

WOS
Держатели документа:
Norwegian Inst Nat Res, Songsveien 68, NO-0855 Oslo, Norway.
Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Environm & Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Univ Copenhagen, Freshwater Biol Sect, Dept Biol, Copenhagen O, Denmark.
Univ Alaska Anchorage, Alaska Ctr Conservat Sci, Anchorage, AK USA.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biophys, Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr, Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Siberian Fed Univ, Inst Fundamental Biol & Biotechnol, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Russian Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Komi Sci Ctr, Ural Branch, Syktyvkar, Russia.
Univ New Brunswick, Canadian Rivers Inst, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Univ New Brunswick, Dept Biol, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Nat Hist Museum Kopavogur, Kopavogur, Iceland.
Norwegian Inst Nat Res, Trondheim, Norway.
Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fac Biol, Dept Gen Ecol & Hydrobiol, Moscow, Russia.
State Nat Reserve Wrangel Isl, Pevek, Chukotka Autono, Russia.
Univ Quebec Chicoutimi, Dept Sci Fondamentales, Saguenay, PQ, Canada.
Univ Laval, Ctr Northern Studies CEN, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Paleoecol Environm Assessment & Res Lab PEARL, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Uppsala, Sweden.
Univ Helsinki, Lammi Biol Stn, Lammi, Finland.

Доп.точки доступа:
Schartau, Ann Kristin; Mariash, Heather L.; Christoffersen, Kirsten S.; Bogan, Daniel; Dubovskaya, Olga P.; Fefilova, Elena B.; Hayden, Brian; Ingvason, Haraldur R.; Ivanova, Elena A.; Kononova, Olga N.; Kravchuk, Elena S.; Lento, Jennifer; Majaneva, Markus; Novichkova, Anna A.; Rautio, Milla; Ruhland, Kathleen M.; Shaftel, Rebecca; Smol, John P.; Vrede, Tobias; Kahilainen, Kimmo K.; RFBRRussian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [20-04-00145_a]

Найти похожие
 
Стандартный
Расширенный
Профессиональный
Распределенный
По словарю
ГРНТИ-навигатор
УДК-навигатор
Тематический навигатор

Другие библиотеки

Библиотека института физики
Центральная научная библиотека КНЦ СО РАН
Библиотека института химии и химический технологии
Библиотека института вычислительного моделирования
Библиотека института леса
Библиотека СФУ
Краевая научная библиотека
© Международная Ассоциация пользователей и разработчиков электронных библиотек и новых информационных технологий
(Ассоциация ЭБНИТ)